Rudolf Hilburn, Jr. v. State
Rudolf Hilburn, Jr. v. State
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-14-00383-CR
RUDOLF HILBURN, JR. APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE
---------- FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 1352567D ---------- MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 ---------- Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal from a plea-bargained conviction for felony driving while intoxicated. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial court’s certification of the right of appeal states that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
We notified appellant that unless he filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal, we would dismiss it. Although appellant filed a response, it does not show grounds for continuing the appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d), 43.2(f); Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).
PER CURIAM PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.
DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b) DELIVERED: December 29, 2014
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.