Raymond Medina v. State
Raymond Medina v. State
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-14-00571-CR
Raymond Medina, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE 119TH DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY, NO. B-13-0412-SA, THE HONORABLE BEN WOODWARD, JUDGE PRESIDING
ORDER FOR CLERK TO PROVIDE A P P E L L A T E R E C O R D TO A P P E L L A N T
PER CURIAM Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief concluding that the instant appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Appellant’s counsel has certified to the Court that he provided copies of the motion and brief to appellant, advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response, and supplied appellant with a form motion for pro se access to the appellate record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-20 (Tex. Crim.
App. 2014). Appellant has timely filed the motion requesting access to the appellate record with this Court.
Appellant’s pro se motion is granted. We hereby direct the clerk of the trial court to provide a copy of the reporter’s record and clerk’s record to appellant, and to provide written verification to this Court of the date and manner in which the appellate record was provided, on or before January 8, 2015. See id. at 321.
It is ordered on December 29, 2014.
Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Field
Do Not Publish
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.