in Re Timothy Gaffney
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-14-00892-CR
IN RE Timothy GAFFNEY
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1 PER CURIAM
Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice
Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
Delivered and Filed: December 31, 2014
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
On December 19, 2014, relator Timothy Gaffney filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus complaining of the trial court’s failure to rule on a pending motion. Relator was convicted and sentenced in the underlying criminal matter in October 2012 and no direct appeal of his conviction or sentence was taken to this court.
Only the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction over matters related to post- conviction relief from an otherwise final felony conviction. See Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); see also TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2014); Board of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for Eighth Dist., 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995) (holding “Article 11.07 provides the exclusive means to challenge a final felony conviction.”). Because the relief sought in relator’s petition relates to post-conviction relief from an otherwise final felony conviction, we are without jurisdiction to consider his petition for writ of mandamus. Accordingly, relator’s petition is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.