Sandra Y. Espinoza v. Ruth v. Thrasher

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-14-00144-CV

Sandra Y. ESPINOZA,

Appellant v.

Ruth V.

Ruth V. THRASHER,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 391870

Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 31, 2014

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

Appellant’s brief was due on October 9, 2014. Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time has been filed. Therefore, on November 19, 2014, we ordered appellant to file, on or before December 1, 2014, her appellant’s brief and a written response reasonably explaining (1) her failure to timely file the brief and (2) why appellee was not significantly injured by her failure to timely file a brief. We explained that if appellant failed to file a brief and the written response by the date ordered, we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal if appellant has failed to comply with a court order). Appellant has not filed any response to our order. We dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.

PER CURIAM