TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 23, 2014

NO. 03-14-00140-CR

Frank Howard McMarion, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 167TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES ROSE AND GOODWIN AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the district court. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the district court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the district court’s judgment of conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 23, 2014

NO. 03-14-00141-CR

Frank Howard McMarion, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 167TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES ROSE AND GOODWIN AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the district court. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the district court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the district court’s judgment of conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 23, 2014

NO. 03-14-00142-CR

Frank Howard McMarion, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 167TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES ROSE AND GOODWIN AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the district court. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the district court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the district court’s judgment of conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 23, 2014

NO. 03-14-00143-CR

Frank Howard McMarion, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 167TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES ROSE AND GOODWIN AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the district court. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the district court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the district court’s judgment of conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 23, 2014

NO. 03-14-00144-CR

Frank Howard McMarion, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 167TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES ROSE AND GOODWIN AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the district court. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the district court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the district court’s judgment of conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 23, 2014

NO. 03-14-00145-CR

Frank Howard McMarion, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 167TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES ROSE AND GOODWIN AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the district court. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the district court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the district court’s judgment of conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.