National City Bank and PNC Bank, N.A. v. Memorial Service Life Insurance Co....
National City Bank and PNC Bank, N.A. v. Memorial Service Life Insurance Co....
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-14-00195-CV
National City Bank and PNC Bank, N.A., Appellants v. Memorial Service Life Insurance Co.; Lincoln Memorial Life Insurance Co., National Prearranged Services, Inc.; and JoAnn Howard & Associates, P.C., Special Deputy Receiver of Memorial Service Life Insurance Company, Lincoln Memorial Life Insurance Company, Appellees
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF 250TH COUNTY, TRAVIS JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GV-08-00945, HONORABLE DARLENE BYRNE, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This appeal challenges the trial court’s temporary injunction signed on March 20, 2014, in response to appellee’s request for protection from a subpoena duces tecum in a case in federal district court in Missouri. After this appeal was filed and appellants filed their initial brief, the Missouri federal district court quashed the subpoena. The appellees contend that this appeal is moot, but appellants argue that they plan to appeal the quashing of the subpoena and that the scope of the injunction appealed exceeds the scope of the subpoena and causes the dispute between the parties to persist.
We are persuaded by appellee’s argument that, because the injunction was issued to address a subpoena that has been quashed, the dispute that prompted the injunction and appeal is moot. “If a case is or becomes moot, the court must vacate any order or judgment previously issued and dismiss the case for want of jurisdiction.” Heckman v. Williamson County, 369 S.W.3d 137, 162 (Tex. 2012). Here, only the temporary injunction that is the subject of this appeal is affected by the quashing of the subpoena. The underlying case remains pending.
We vacate the temporary injunction signed on March 20, 2014, and dismiss this appeal as moot.
Jeff Rose, Justice Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin Vacated and Dismissed as Moot Filed: August 29, 2014
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.