Deshawn Latral Yates v. State
Deshawn Latral Yates v. State
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-13-00773-CR
Deshawn Latral Yates, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY, 391ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-13-0194-SB, THE HONORABLE THOMAS J. GOSSETT, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
In an open plea to the court, appellant Deshawn Latral Yates pleaded guilty and judicially confessed to the offense of evading detention. See Tex. Penal Code § 38.04(a). After hearing evidence, the trial court assessed appellant’s punishment at 270 days in a state jail facility. See id. § 38.04(b)(1)(A) (offense is state jail felony if defendant previously convicted of evading detention).
Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); see also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988).
Counsel has represented to the Court that he provided copies of the motion and brief to appellant and advised him of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief.
See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d at 766. No pro se brief or other written response has been filed.
We have conducted an independent review of the record, including appellate counsel’s brief and the record of the plea proceedings, and find no reversible error. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d at 766; Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim.
App. 2005). We agree with counsel that the record presents no arguably meritorious grounds for review and the appeal is frivolous. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
__________________________________________ J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin Affirmed Filed: August 12, 2014 Do Not Publish
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.