Blayne Williams v. City of Austin
Blayne Williams v. City of Austin
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-14-00123-CV
Blayne Williams, Appellant v. City of Austin, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 345TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-12-003127, HONORABLE TIM SULAK, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Blayne Williams’s brief was due on April 25, 2014, but this Court granted Williams’s motion to extend time to file brief until June 24, 2014. On July 1, 2014, the Clerk of this Court sent notice to Williams that appellant’s brief was due on June 24, 2014, and that it was overdue. The Clerk requested a response by July 11, 2014, and notified Williams that the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution if Williams did not respond to this Court by that date.
Williams has not filed his brief or otherwise responded. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c). __________________________________________ Melissa Goodwin, Justice Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: August 7, 2014
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.