Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2014

Michael Todd Wade v. State

Michael Todd Wade v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided May 6, 2014

Michael Todd Wade v. State

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00203-CR

Michael Todd Wade, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 28865, HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Michael Todd Wade, appearing pro se, seeks to appeal from the trial court’s denial of his motion for judgment nunc pro tunc. In criminal cases, unless expressly authorized by statute, appellate courts only have jurisdiction to review final judgments. Apolinar v. State, 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); see Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 44.02 (“A defendant in any criminal action has the right of appeal under the rules hereinafter prescribed . . . .”).

An order denying a motion for judgment nunc pro tunc is not a final, appealable order. Castor v. State, 205 S.W.3d 666, 667 (Tex. App.—Waco 2006, no pet.); see Abbott v. State, 271 S.W.3d 694, 697 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (no jurisdiction over appeal of post-judgment order denying time-credit motion). Nor does the denial create a right to an interlocutory appeal. Castor, 205 S.W.3d at 667.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f). __________________________________________ Scott K. Field, Justice Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Field Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: May 6, 2014 Do Not Publish

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.