Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2014

Naum Antonio Fuentes-Sanchez v. State

Naum Antonio Fuentes-Sanchez v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided April 17, 2014

Naum Antonio Fuentes-Sanchez v. State

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 17, 2014

NO. 03-12-00281-CR

Naum Antonio Fuentes-Sanchez, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 33RD DISTRICT COURT OF BURNET COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD AFFIRMED IN PART; MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED IN PART -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES

This is an appeal from the judgments of conviction signed by the trial court on April 12, 2012.

Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no error requiring reversal in the trial court’s judgments of conviction as to Counts Three, Four, Five, and Six. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgments of conviction for Counts Three (burglary of a habitation), Four (aggravated robbery), Five (aggravated robbery), and Six (injury to the elderly). However, there was error requiring correction in the judgments for Counts One, Two, Seven, and Eight. Therefore, the Court modifies the remaining judgments of conviction as follows: the judgment for Count One (aggravated sexual assault) is modified to delete “CONSECUTIVELY” and instead reflect that the sentence shall run “CONCURRENTLY”; the judgment for Count Two (aggravated sexual assault) is modified to delete the cumulation order; and the judgments for Counts Seven (aggravated assault) and Eight (aggravated assault) are modified to reflect that the “Statute for Offense” is “22.02 Penal Code.” As so modified, we affirm the trial court’s judgments of conviction for Counts One, Two, Seven, and Eight. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.