Billy Kallus v. Auction.com
Billy Kallus v. Auction.com
Opinion
Order filed March 11, 2014
In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 14-13-00570-CV ____________ BILLY KALLUS, Appellant V. AUCTION.COM, Appellee
On Appeal from the 270th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011-37654 ORDER On November 26, 2013, appellant filed a brief that is not in compliance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. The brief fails to comply with the rules.
See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(a) and (i). In particular, appellant has failed to provide adequate citations to the record. Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(i).
Accordingly, we order appellant's brief filed November 26, 2013 stricken.
Appellant is ordered to file a brief that complies with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure within ten (10) days of the date of this order. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1.
If appellant files another brief that does not comply with Rule 38, the Court may strike the brief, prohibit appellant from filing another, and proceed as if appellant had failed to file a brief. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.9(a). Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a), where an appellant has failed to file a brief, we may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. If appellant fails to timely file a brief in accordance with Rule 38, the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).
Submission of the case on the briefs March 20, 2014, is postponed pending appellant’s filing of a brief that complies with Rule 38. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.9(b).
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices McCally, Busby, and Donovan.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.