Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2014

in Re: Jeffrey Baron

in Re: Jeffrey Baron
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided September 16, 2014

in Re: Jeffrey Baron

Opinion

DENY; and Opinion Filed September 16, 2014.

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-01145-CV No. 05-14-01176-CV IN RE JEFFREY BARON, Relator Original Proceeding from the 193rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-10-11915 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices O'Neill, Lang, and Brown Opinion by Justice O'Neill

Relator filed two petitions for writs of mandamus requesting that the Court order the trial court to vacate its orders denying realtor’s motions to strike the interventions of Bush Ruotolo & Simpson, LLP, Stromberg Stock, PLLC, Gary Lyon and Mark L. Taylor. The facts and issues are well-known to the parties so we do not recount them here. Ordinarily, to obtain mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839–40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding).

Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

/Michael J. O'Neill/ MICHAEL J. O'NEILL JUSTICE

141145F.P05

–2–

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.