Texas A&M University, Dave Parrott, and BG Joe Ramirez v. Gustavo Carapia
Texas A&M University, Dave Parrott, and BG Joe Ramirez v. Gustavo Carapia
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-14-00280-CV TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY, DAVE PARROTT, AND BG JOE RAMIREZ, Appellants v. GUSTAVO CARAPIA, Appellee
From the 272nd District Court Brazos County, Texas Trial Court No. 14-002220-CV-272
ORDER
Appellant’s motion to substitute counsel was filed on November 13, 2014. The motion does not indicate that a copy was provided to the client in a manner of delivery authorized by the rule. TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(b), (d). The Court simply reminds counsel of that obligation; but because the rule does not require counsel to certify compliance with that aspect of the rule to the Court, the Court will not deny the motion on that basis.
Accordingly, the Court grants the motion to substitute Susan M. Watson in place of Angela V. Colmenero.
PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Motion granted Order issued and filed November 20, 2014
Texas A&M University v. Carapia Page 2
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.