Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2014

Larry Jermaine Wigenton v. State

Larry Jermaine Wigenton v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided June 5, 2014

Larry Jermaine Wigenton v. State

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-14-00057-CR

LARRY JERMAINE WIGENTON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court 3 of Dallas County Dallas County, Texas Trial Court No. F-1371124-J

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

ORDER Larry Jermaine Wigenton has filed a motion complaining that he has no counsel in his pending appeal. The appeal was transferred to this Court from the Fifth Court of Appeals.

Wigenton asks this Court to appoint counsel to represent him. He is before this Court in an appeal from the revocation of his community supervision and the final adjudication of guilt.

Wigenton had appointed counsel both at the original hearing and at his adjudication hearing.

The record sheds no light on the nature of the previous counsel’s appointment or possible release from her duty to represent the defendant. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 1.051 (West Supp. 2013). This Court has contacted Wigenton’s last appointed counsel, Pamela Segura-Muhammad of the Dallas County Public Defender’s Office, and she has informed this Court that her understanding is that she is no longer representing Wigenton.

Under these circumstances, pursuant to Article 1.051(d) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, we find it appropriate to grant Wigenton’s motion for the appointment of counsel, and abate this appeal to the trial court for the purpose of appointing counsel to represent Wigenton on appeal.

The appointment shall be made within fifteen days of the date of this order.

A supplemental clerk’s record containing the appointment shall be filed with this Court no later than ten days after the appointment is made.

All appellate timetables are stayed and will resume on the filing of the supplemental clerk’s record containing the order of appointment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT Date: June 5, 2014

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.