AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed April 30, 2014.

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00672-CR JOSEPH VANN HUTCHINSON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F12-58072-H MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang, Myers, and Brown Opinion by Justice Brown A jury convicted Joseph Vann Hutchinson of aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon and assessed punishment at fourteen years’ imprisonment. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response.

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

/Ada Brown/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47

130672F.U05

-2- Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

JOSEPH VANN HUTCHINSON, Appeal from the Criminal District Court Appellant No. 1 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F12-58072-H).

No. 05-13-00672-CR V. Opinion delivered by Justice Brown, Justices Lang and Myers participating.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

Judgment entered April 30, 2014.

/Ada Brown/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE

-3-