Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2014

Tideport Distributing, Inc. v. Ramon Cerda, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Brittany Cerda

Tideport Distributing, Inc. v. Ramon Cerda, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Brittany Cerda
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided March 20, 2014

Tideport Distributing, Inc. v. Ramon Cerda, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Brittany Cerda

Opinion

NUMBER 13-12-00493-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG TIDEPORT DISTRIBUTING, INC., Appellant, v. RAMON CERDA, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF BRITTANY CERDA, DECEASED, Appellee.

On appeal from the 148th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellant, Tideport Distributing, Inc., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 148th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in trial court cause number 10-2767- E. On January 29, 2014, we granted appellant’s unopposed motion to abate the appeal pending finalization of the parties’ settlement agreement. Appellant has now filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal with prejudice.

This Court, having considered the documents on file and the unopposed motion to dismiss with prejudice, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1)(a). Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The appeal is hereby REINSTATED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

Appellant further requests that this Court release the appellant’s sureties, Westchester Fire Insurance Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, from any further obligation on the supersedeas bonds filed by appellant. The request is GRANTED. We hereby release the appellant’s sureties, Westchester Fire Insurance Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, from any further obligation on the supersedeas bonds filed by appellant.

In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same. Cf. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) (“Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.”). Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 20th day of March, 2014.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.