Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2014

Tanita F. Kehoe, Scott Kehoe, and Thomas David White, Jr. v. Edward A. Clouse and Helen R. Clouse

Tanita F. Kehoe, Scott Kehoe, and Thomas David White, Jr. v. Edward A. Clouse and Helen R. Clouse
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided October 27, 2014

Tanita F. Kehoe, Scott Kehoe, and Thomas David White, Jr. v. Edward A. Clouse and Helen R. Clouse

Opinion

Jf ourtlj Court of Antonio, October 27,2014

No. 04-14-00151-CV

Tanita F. Kehoe, Scott Kehoe, and Thomas David White, Jr., Appellants

v.

Edward A. Clouse and Helen R. Clouse, Appellees

Trial Court Case No. 10-627-CCL

ORDER The Court has reviewed the record and briefs in this appeal and has determined that oral argument will not significantly aid it in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.8. Therefore, all requests for oral argument are denied, and the cause is advanced for ON BRIEFS submission on December 9, 2014, to the following panel: Justice Angelini, Justice Marion, and Justice Barnard. All parties will be notified of the Court's decision in this appeal in accordance with Tex. R. App. P. 48.

Either party may file a motion requesting the Court to reconsider its determination that oral argument will not significantly aid the Court in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.8. Such a motion should be filed within ten (10) days from the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED on October 27, 2014.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and a/fixed the seal o/the said court on this October 27. 2014.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.