Chasidy Gonnella and Andrew Ottaway v. David S. Kohm and Associates
Chasidy Gonnella and Andrew Ottaway v. David S. Kohm and Associates
Chasidy Gonnella and Andrew Ottaway v. David S. Kohm and Associates
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-13-00415-CV
CHASIDY GONNELLA AND APPELLANTS ANDREW OTTAWAY V. DAVID S. KOHM AND APPELLEE ASSOCIATES
------------ FROM THE 355TH DISTRICT COURT OF HOOD COUNTY ------------ MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------ We have considered appellants’ “Motion To Dismiss Appeal.” It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellants, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).
PER CURIAM PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.
DELIVERED: May 8, 2014
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.