Carl Smith v. Houston Police Department
Carl Smith v. Houston Police Department
Opinion
Opinion issued May 20, 2014.
In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-13-00828-CV ——————————— CARL SMITH, Appellant V. HOUSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, Appellee
On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2012-64456
MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Carl Smith, has neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013), 101.0411 (West Supp. 2013); Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9127 (Tex. Aug. 16, 2013). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5; 42.3(c).
We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Sharp, and Huddle.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.