in Re Husqvarna, Inc., Husqvarna Outdoor Products, Inc., Poulan-Texas and Co.Conn's Inc.
in Re Husqvarna, Inc., Husqvarna Outdoor Products, Inc., Poulan-Texas and Co.Conn's Inc.
Opinion
Opinion issued February 3, 2014.
In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-14-00055-CV ——————————— IN RE HUSQVARNA CONSUMER OUTDOOR PRODUCTS N.A., INC. AND CONN'S APPLICANCES, INC., Relators
Original Proceeding for Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION Relators, Husqvarna Consumer Outdoor Products N.A., Inc. and Conn’s Appliances, Inc. have filed a petition for writ of mandamus, contending that respondent, the Honorable Ben Hardin, abused his discretion in denying requested mental examinations of real parties in interest.1 See TEX. R. CIV. P. 204.
The underlying case is Jimmy Sanders and Charlotte Laws-Sanders, Individually and As Next Friend of Trenity Sanders v. Husqvarna, Inc., Husqvarna Outdoor We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We further dismiss as moot relators’ emergency motion to stay underlying case.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Sharp.
Products, Inc.; Poulan-Texas, Co.; and Conn’s Inc., cause no. 67207, in the 23rd District Court of Brazoria County.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.