Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2015

Greyhound Lines, Inc. and Paul Flueckiger v. Caitlin Hassler and Jennifer Hassler

Greyhound Lines, Inc. and Paul Flueckiger v. Caitlin Hassler and Jennifer Hassler
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided January 19, 2015

Greyhound Lines, Inc. and Paul Flueckiger v. Caitlin Hassler and Jennifer Hassler

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-14-00300-CV ____________________ GREYHOUND LINES, INC. AND PAUL FLUECKIGER, Appellants V. CAITLIN HASSLER AND JENNIFER HASSLER, Appellees _______________________________________________________ ______________ On Appeal from the 284th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 11-02-01369 CV ________________________________________________________ _____________ MEMORANDUM OPINION The appellants, Greyhound Lines, Inc. and Paul Flueckiger, filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal with prejudice. Appellants further request that this Court release the appellants’ surety, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, from any further obligation on the supersedeas bond filed by appellants, and that we tax costs against the party incurring same. The motion is voluntarily made by the appellants prior to any decision of this Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). No other party filed a notice of appeal.

We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. We hereby release the appellants’ surety, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, from any further obligation on the supersedeas bond filed by the appellants in connection with this appeal. Costs are assessed against the incurring party.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

________________________________ LEANNE JOHNSON Justice

Submitted on January 14, 2015 Opinion Delivered January 15, 2015 Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.