Dr. Glen Hurlston v. City of Princeton, TX
Dr. Glen Hurlston v. City of Princeton, TX
Opinion
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed February 4, 2015.
SIn The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00574-CV DR. GLEN HURLSTON, Appellant V. CITY OF PRINCETON, TX, Appellee On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 199-00051-2013 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Fillmore, and Brown Opinion by Justice Fillmore Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. By postcard dated August 14, 2014, we notified appellant the time for filing his brief had expired. We directed appellant to file both his brief and an extension motion within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to file a brief and an extension motion would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not filed a brief, filed an extension motion, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal.
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b)(c).
/Robert M. Fillmore/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE 140574F.P05 JUSTICE S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT DR. GLEN HURLSTON, Appellant On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas No. 05-14-00574-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. 199-00051-2013.
Opinion delivered by Justice Fillmore.
CITY OF PRINCETON, TX, Appellee Justices Bridges and Brown participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.
It is ORDERED that appellee CITY OF PRINCETON, TX recover its costs of this appeal from appellant DR. GLEN HURLSTON.
Judgment entered this 4th day of February, 2015.
–2–
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.