Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2015

Destyn David Frederick v. State

Destyn David Frederick v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided July 28, 2015

Destyn David Frederick v. State

Opinion

The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas July 27, 2015 No. 04-14-00246-CR Destyn David FREDERICK, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the 81st Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas Trial Court No. 11-09-00041-CRL Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding

ORDER On July 21, 2015, appellant filed a pro se motion to suspend electronic filing and a pro se reply brief, asserting appointed counsel had abandoned the appeal. Appellate counsel, however, timely filed an appellant’s brief in this appeal on April 20, 2015, and the filing of a reply brief is not mandatory under the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. In Texas, appellants do not have a right to hybrid representation. Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623, 625 (Tex. Crim. App. 1981).

Therefore, appellant’s pro se motion and reply brief are STRICKEN and will not be considered by the court.

It is so ORDERED on the 27th day of July, 2015.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ____________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.