Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2015

Adam Perez v. State

Adam Perez v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided August 28, 2015

Adam Perez v. State

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 28, 2015

NO. 03-15-00412-CR

Adam Perez, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 147TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an attempted appeal from the proceeding in the trial court. Having reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because no final judgment of conviction was rendered. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 28, 2015

NO. 03-15-00413-CR

Adam Perez, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 147TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an attempted appeal from the proceeding in the trial court. Having reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because no final judgment of conviction was rendered. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 28, 2015

NO. 03-15-00414-CR

Adam Perez, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 147TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an attempted appeal from the proceeding in the trial court. Having reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because no final judgment of conviction was rendered. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.