TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MARCH 27, 2015

NO. 03-14-00214-CR

Jonathan Matthew Porterie, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND BOURLAND REVERSED AND VACATED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in the court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court reverses and vacates the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Appellant is discharged from all further liability for the charged offense of improper photography. Appellee shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MARCH 27, 2015

NO. 03-14-00215-CR

Jonathan Matthew Porterie, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND BOURLAND AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction.

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MARCH 27, 2015

NO. 03-14-00216-CR

Jonathan Matthew Porterie, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND BOURLAND AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction.

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MARCH 27, 2015

NO. 03-14-00217-CR

Jonathan Matthew Porterie, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND BOURLAND AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction.

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.