Unocal Pipeline Company v. BP Pipelines (Alaska) Inc., Conoco Phillips Transportation Alaska, Inc., and Exonmobile Pipeline Co.
Unocal Pipeline Company v. BP Pipelines (Alaska) Inc., Conoco Phillips Transportation Alaska, Inc., and Exonmobile Pipeline Co.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON ORDER ON MOTIONS Cause number: 01-15-00266-CV Style: Unocal Pipeline Co. v. BP Pipelines (Alaska) Inc., ConocoPhillips Transportation Alaska, Inc. and ExxonMobil Pipeline Co. Date motions filed*: September 15, 2015 Type of motions: Unopposed Motions to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Steven G. Reed and Lara E. Romansic; Motions of Resident Attorney Michael V. Powell in Support of Motions to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Steven G. Reed and Lara E. Romansic Parties filing motions: Appellees BP Pipelines (Alaska) Inc., ConocoPhillips Transportation Alaska, Inc., and ExxonMobil Pipeline Co. Document to be filed: N/A Is appeal accelerated? No. Ordered that motions are: Granted If document is to be filed, document due: N/A Denied Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Other: _____________________________________
Judge's signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes Acting for the Court Date: September 17, 2015
November 7, 2008 Revision
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.