Joshua Jumbo v. Rittenhouse SRO Ltd
Joshua Jumbo v. Rittenhouse SRO Ltd
Opinion
Opinion issued March 31, 2015
In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-14-00959-CV ——————————— JOSHUA JUMBO, Appellant V. RITTENHOUSE SRO LTD., Appellee
On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1054776
MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Joshua Jumbo, has neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013), 101.0411 (West Supp. 2014); Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and before the Judicial Panel on Multi-district Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 13-9127 (Tex. Aug. 16, 2013). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c).
We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Lloyd.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.