Amy Lynn Dayringer v. Gared Dayringer
Amy Lynn Dayringer v. Gared Dayringer
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-15-00458-CV
Amy Lynn Dayringer, Appellant v. Gared Dayringer, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY, 20TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. CV34,454, HONORABLE JOHN YOUNGBLOOD, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The appellate record must include the clerk’s record from the trial court.1 The clerk’s record in this cause was due in this Court on September 18, 2015, but no record was filed. We received notice from the Milam County district clerk’s office on October 2, 2015, that appellant has neither paid nor made arrangement for payment of the record. Nor has appellant filed an affidavit of indigence.2 Under these circumstances, this Court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.3 On October 5, 2015, we sent notice to appellant that the clerk’s record was overdue and that the appeal may be dismissed for want of prosecution if appellant did not make arrangements
See Tex. R. App. P. 34.1, 34.5(a).
See id. R. 20.1(2).
See id. R. 37.3(b). for the record and submit a status report to this Court on or before October 15, 2015. To date, appellant has not responded in any way and the clerk’s record has not been filed. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.4
__________________________________________ Bob Pemberton, Justice Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Pemberton and Field Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: November 10, 2015
See id. R. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.