Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2015

James Bradley Warden v. State

James Bradley Warden v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided November 24, 2015

James Bradley Warden v. State

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 24, 2015

NO. 03-15-00298-CR

James Bradley Warden, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 424TH DISTRICT COURT OF BURNET COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND BOURLAND MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no error in the court’s judgment requiring reversal. However, there was error in the judgment of conviction that requires correction. Therefore, the Court modifies the trial court’s judgment of conviction for possession of controlled substance to reflect that the “Statute for Offense” is “481.115(a), (b) Health and Safety Code.” The judgment of conviction, as modified, is affirmed. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 24, 2015

NO. 03-15-00299-CR

James Bradley Warden, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 424TH DISTRICT COURT OF BURNET COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND BOURLAND MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no error in the court’s judgment requiring reversal. However, there was error in the judgment of conviction that requires correction. Therefore, the Court modifies the trial court’s judgment of conviction for evading detention with a vehicle to reflect that the “Statute for Offense” is “38.04(a),(b)(2)(A) Penal Code.” The judgment of conviction, as modified, is affirmed. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.