Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2015

Perry, Gerald Allen

Perry, Gerald Allen
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided January 20, 2015

Perry, Gerald Allen

Opinion

99 OOQ ; o IN THh TEXAS COURT OFCKlMlNALAPPS/I^S EX ?AvTe ^- * lJ /Ml T) C4USFAto^o7S35§CE|VEDIN " ™f0FCRIMINALAPPEALS GeirAld yelled Kerry ^RlTAfo.^O£9JAN20 2015

^fe^^^^^^Ss^^ TO jWE WotioxAhLE JUbGE OP5A1LI, CoUkT I COMES NOUJ.Ger/lU /4lleA/ V'e.*-<ry&M<JP.Q( •£>! i'. n

STAT EQfTTXA3 v. ffet^dI 4|U ^ ^ $T Cl'e"f''^ The CAU5e luWe sKe UA5 -fee Chfrf pT + B^?,v'e wuMbe«d T-e^AsfroM 1181-|<m *TsfcW ft,• +^1^°'" of ^r/s County.

Judical M.jVtcc^lKefAcT^^T+Sl^V 70(b^r^9)+^^

MOTION DENIED In Stxte EX Rcl . Sherrod v/0 Oirey 79o S.i/U.ad.705,7da-oq {TZt.App.-A/AArUlo H<to) tha App&lU+e. Courts tte S^ve^bfsih/cf of Te*A5 held 1k*+xV +Ke duty to .Ai/ofd * conflict of jWeresf- Aias /a^ beeM imposed owthe pmosecu+o\rs erf "tors S+xfe . See (e.g^G^r^i^ S+Ate ^Tex.Cir^. 55fe 35a s.w/.i*a7tfqaa) The duty rSpreW/^ codfrfed iN/^+rdea.ol rf-rheTeyAsro^ rr . . ,n , A^oUUAlVer^s mo) Tha statute prwfdes /„ p^rttfwtf'Wfc D/s/*- t-ict AfWijey sU V-epre3flw+*tfie SMTP «.^>T ^- • *c*y"-s/-

al^W-the de^.dJ^T+0 due o~ ^^Taf;vlW AWN &/fc s.w.aA. <*•,, ^fe tex.Cy.Z£Zg ^Al3° ***** foNAl quJLJT ^ keMf-rf-fce S+Ate presetW/frf-

*#' sit rst^c r****^ p»-^^is^ n+4, ! j f +A1 r tHAl IhAT Coutfs /Mustexvj^/ve ewer/ IWos cokrfj-Aryfo-ttje Stye's /Vferp^A+fo/^e^J-e cfr=uW>w:« iM loW.cK Ar+ide<a.ol Must-be. construed bn^d IV enough To/Wc/ode Aducrse eMoloVMeKir by A-ieM'bet-s of Tke DfstV/cfAtto^Mey's Offrae AS wall A3 fte -D&fric.+Attorney hiVuseff, /w ot-dei. f0 p^c/ ^ Co NsffTjtfcjNaIrfghfs sFa drfewdA/v/t» The ThaI COUV-f's dof/ ujhe^ ruling atJ AsHdtl'oiv To dhqanl'fy

AH-\froM corf|rc+a offhrferes+ •, . U^K 7 P^ec\A d&^j.

AtWuev h,*seff, butA\ecT '^"f^^^e elected £&fcf ^ CO^+f+ul?oWAl grounds AS up^ iW AP«*fcuU CASe

%*UWe Was iMpfeMeN+ccHfeis 1 ™"«y^ -tested. ,^T/)e A0odSe fsAW «VjW,hLe^^ O^Court. SeeCa^o. „.CW,,,, ^^^^^V / he. Te*A3 Co^sti,-|-\J+?oM/\H-rcle5seef\o« f| seX-Forikih-e-groowds for JuarciAl drsq^tr-FfDATfo^cX+provrdes /?a/ releiM^Art Wa/0 i|aScLf'Erf" ^? V°^T^ JlJ^ ^" ^ *>**,c*o« .•n%e surf betbremT&£?% ™ T ^ **??<£**pArite 3d. </ft,«H8-*l C^S " ^^MKEJO'cwm^us P^ioual/pv-Ac^ced ,X si j f ^ ^^"ihe Judge ^Afa Judo* £vfcArfo,*k^ T?i. f Acc^!n9Wrecoa»i'zes ^d5e p^f^y prA(,+fced l*'Til' ^ " Wye" ^ ^°^e

AAACi S^a+i

a'«cr Appeal r The t)/^(Vf >4# ^'^^-W^,^,,^ w

.*?>?W-:' '•^;-;:>' describing ~H\q TexAs Rule o^CiVil Procedure#ffifa£Dfa) uAs Applied (tsiikh hAbeAS Compos f>\raceedr*ig FxpAr+e feinry u^r///o, •a-V^-'Q>'fWAfl ojould be va/ol JadrcMl "orders etfkreA wrfodt AMd^^INA| ^sea^.+AUbe4sCo,pus^oceedr4^^S> as d,3^90,shed W^ c^/V,*! «Wdyorcnil.rMeed4 C« f Jll7 <M"• T^ f ***** Corpus i'i ActvrtAetravuMid, .sgo^edb^c.vi! rules Z.yfes v.Befo LlF.R.b.^a(s.bJ&cm^ J-M 44^ leMAKi y. S+A+e 66/ S*w«ad, io^}loCT££.c^AppJ98?^1helZMis CDUvt of CtikainIaV AppeAls Keld A^ ZKOo(A\ 3edt/'orf((b) Novo cocAf"- ^^> T^» Rvie erf C1V11 Pr-ocedure =fr l&CA) Appltesib c^i/vktolCAses.

Ms,chammi i+luas iMfiicftiy'heJd Tex.R, ziv.P#um*\ Avplte ^'^^1 CASesa U/^/ff lAjAS iMplttf L DeQWc The TexAs Couti otCirf KfNAl AppeAls /MAde eXpir^ft ikI Aw/a/d \nStx~h Q55S,W*vA~5</3r 5<J<M_5 (Tetf,cr.App«i993)

The worc^pAf-ty-rK/ Kw.CiV.St-.iBlS Ai~fJ«<? uas m* iM-hd to T^VTd^ ^J_-F +he.re u_iflS ^ IiKeU Inood fhAf" M/fdr^^/oX/pei--tw- .Vglb The Sfcffe af Te>M8 V, G^lJAI/e^/ P^rrV CAoseA/o, frs^aa. DAtep^eoA^d 8-^8-si gy ddb D>1 /*>. v?5 Aq<wcy Ji_P£ o//? a/O . 7fl78feq/ Arrestee Q-sn-c,i Alrlr c^£

A, cW Pr05ecuW Ha^Cou^.^tA^ ^T^ ^« Debbie MAKftoolstH'ck?, rU Sob+' +f App.BClfe^taJ^ rF ApplrcAKTf WoOVa hAve purled ^^eXb^fcusAc^ So HoMorAbleqJudge K^rc.pl-p bebbfe iMLtoo^ ^ ;i„ i St„ck!fM sh nL ^-> /j ' uricrvuw Should hA^e Recused ,

•A Spgr.iAl m>M,^HC effect 0ti-fe0 D.,t;y-H,,i-;r j.JC 'j A ^ ' Wdfed- oMthe public, r S -l. ''TTi*«9uuli4ht<»^,tj, r- ^ ^M'hepubl.r.. TexAS Drsc/pl.wy Rules of Ph*fessW Addud,cAt,M9 a CASe she hAd offrdAl respoW&/,'+V , u , t-epresewted "the STATf nF Tcvis /f-i - .A* _, , 0,'e,' ^^^s/ie beeAuse she co\ld b^ The ST4TE OP TEX43 ^ ^ of Jud<^ ^ vtor of /\ppWcAi\it requestH-h»A++he THAI Cou^Tat-fke TexASCoutT ofCr/WHAl AppeAls declAre All prior ordevscrf l&oth D/sfr/ctCoorf sTgMedby CtebbreMAwtodfc SivfcKli* Null anA v/ofd aWJ U<Ja Neu, heAri^ ok/the ApplrcATfoMstW luV/tof^1*43 Corpus .

C.f.XM RE.kEM S«13.w.3d. SW-^c, CcWp^CK^r-Tfer^pp^ fW VrCounty nAnris 1 u/e+-e b'e ^^Oo* Um o *„-+- Stw-cWf*/ •„_,. ForMe, r/,,vf fVosecuTor orMe»-Ui/it P ? ofS rssroM rf-fc. offe^lTi^Q.t-0r^53^ieS ^'-^ com» Respe&t^l 1/ SuWTfed , Gei-A\dAlle.ti Perry XdecUme uK.de,"the peMAlty of perjury?^ V^-P istrue Awd correct „a8 Uses/7^+0'e90w9 ^EtecoTeb ON 'aMn VjMd- •sfgwfure 'I _Certif,V4f^ „-f <:»,-,.,-rr A 1i >U°5°/WAl I Awd-Jhe Or/o,WA/75 7e*v«G,.)wt,rf'rv ' .

AppeA\s ,M ^osf^T^AS p.0< Bo^o8 CA^itl^^

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.