Semien, William Paul
Semien, William Paul
Opinion
yio.'oq-13-OOSWl-Cft Jn The Court of Appeals OP The Tl/nth Supreme Ji/efi'cinl District Beaumont, Tews (JlJ4JPP)Pflui-S£fflIfy) flppellnnt vs.
Appellee On Bppeftl in £«u^ Wo. J3-HW CrimiTift\ District Court, JePftcson County, 7ej#tf ' JqhnS-tei/enSjJurfje PreSidinj fippellnnts nation For ^tension of Ti/ne To File Appellants Pfo~5e Petition For Discretionflru $e(//eiu
Uillinm Pnulieynien Bill P. Clements Unit RECEIVED IN *Aiqo434(fi COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS u' ^ ° ' ^UOi 5pur5£l! jan 12 2015 MriHo,T^sw.w Abel Acosti Clerk %. b<)-l3-QQ5$X-Cft LdJU-IfW PMLSZWZW J If) 7HB Court7 OF ftPPEflLS VS. I SW£ OF 7JEXAS 7H£Sm?bfT£XM> I VJVti 0X37MICT ywioy? Tft &n£y?/) rzwf to mjg flppaiflvrcs PPfl-.K. PETL71QYI MJ)T.«Qf TTAMfljfi£lfTEfJ TO 7tf£ VOWOfWBtS fUSTXt£S OFSftlD HOOPil < WOb)COWS UlU-IftW Pfluj- S£Ptt£fl, Vppellwi in ihe nbcfe Styled And numbered dftuse,nnd owes this Court #> grant nn extension op time to Pile ftppellnnts Pro-se petition For Discretion nru Re\zieu3, pursvmt to Rule set forth in theTexns fiules of fippel|nteProeedure;nnc! for qooddnu^e ShouJslWPollouJinQ' I.
Thii cme is on nppenl Prom the Criminal District Court op Jefferson Cfluntij, Terns; TheCflSe belotu uins staled THESTflT£6F T£fflS 1/5. U)lU-ZflP) ?R0J-SEWl£'fl,Pii)6 numbered I3-TO9; HP.
Appellant (Jns toni/rctecl e>f Jejuni ftesnult; fippellnnt mas assessed ft sentence oP fiPtM Pii/e (55) uenrs confinement in the institutionnl Dit/ision on floi/ember^aors; flotice of flppenl uws gii/en on TWernber A(*,M3; izr.
Tiuo U)e&emior) nPik the Pro-St Pppellnnt Brief hns bee/) filed in -this tflose, /his Honornble £ourt§rMie6 those extension;.
HP, r Rppellnnti F/rst motion to feend the time for Pi inq the Pro-Se Bppellnnt!s |3rtefu)A$ Piled by TerrenceLeon HoIwes,on June/o^o/y; Appellant Momen At thnt time for sfiid flppenl. Seeond motion cons filed bu Ui/liflm Pp>u\$erniert, Pro-$e Appellnnt, onorrtbout August^ W1/; mr. T/)e Appellate br<eP tuns elue on October /o, #>;*/; The Court of Appeals' rendered its judgment on flot/ember/^o/y ftppellnnt requests w extension of time of thirty (30) dmjs Prom the present dftfe,le. Jflnunry \%WS', flppellnnt relies on tVie follow/no Pncts flsgood (muse wd beliei/es ttwt he hns e^tenuntina Circumstances fnnt require this ftootM for extension of time be grwrted; M- 0f\ WovernherxS^ow, Appellant received ntruenndCorrect Copu oP the Court's opinion jqmd JueJnwent.; fthm with notip/cnt/onop the DePencJnnti nqht to Pile a pro-se petition For c/fscretionnfy rei/ieu underfilled.
Pppellnnt \s nInumnn oP the jruj nndrenllu/tr^ Iw/Tiq A difficult time trumj to nccurntely present this pejiflon for dtfcrefion/?r<j revi'eui Appellant ium plnc^d in trnnsit 5tntu3 by thejrH P. Clements unit nc/ministrntion/stflff lAJithout nny of HiS property ndWithout htfte^ mnterinl/uorK including noy transcripts nnd appellate papers fl$ itms plneed in Bill P. t\etY)zr)ts Unit property room, ns ofthis \S^ dny of Decern ber? ioi4; I hnt/e yet to (we nil my property returned tome', Appellant cnnnot eppedii/elu present ibis Pro-3e petition For Discretionary Piei/ieu) under flute (*? oJithoot nil hvs UqrI m^emlJ uorK including Appellee pnpers rmd frffflStripts; The fiddtfionfll time requested is not sought solely Per delna, nor 30ught frivolously, bu1u)\i\ be oPgenuine nssistflnceto pppelmi in prepnrinfl Appellants brief as fellas researching file Jmu< UH£R£F0fl£? ftppellnnt prnus ft at thisCourtgrnnt this motionnnd modlpy nnde^tenc/ the deadline for Piiinq Appellant's Pro-Se Petition For Discretion nru flei/ieu to Jhnunry ;y,£o)5; ortW ^ tor/ grnntsuch ndditionnl time ns isjust And proper.
^ertiPicfite&PSeMCt Xhereby Certify fhnton December n, xoiy;nCorrectmStfOe Copij of Appellant's Wotiorji Foft. ^tension 10 Pile his Pro-5e Petition For Discretionary ftet//eu) tuns mailed to the tour+of Criminal Appeals bu OS. First Clftss m\ Addressed to the Court oPCrimmnl Append at P.O. &0P m®%} Austin, Te^ns qnn, ftppellMt7 prose L)illinmPnol5em\en Bi\\ P. Clements Unit *oI90H3^(p ^Ol3pur5cH Amnrillo;Texri5 19107-9 (oOlff December fl,3io/4 Clerk oP the Co^rt oPCnminnl Pippenls of lexm Po. %ox mo% ftosftn.Tejrm '. 12711 faittet Dumber'* oq'\3-OQ5VL~t9\ 7r\pi\ Court Q3\se nmbzc' I3-J19/9 DenrtlerKoP the Court ^ncloseo1 plemePihimy pro-St DePemSfints Wet/on For Time to /vie PetifiofT For Pi'scfetiWru (Wfeu), f/ense #/e f/irs Wotion and bring it to the attention oPtheCourt ©PCriminnl Appeals 0F7e#&s P/ensednte-stnmp this notation and return it to merit Me address 5hoton above, XPilso reouest thflt you notifi) rtfe of the Courtis ruling on my TAotion.
<Smcerekj, , t Defendant, Pro-Se "
RECEIVED IN COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS JAN 12 2015
Abel Acosta, Clerk
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.