in Re: Jody Ford McCreary
in Re: Jody Ford McCreary
Opinion
)2*S Cam 1 O/' /Iff e/ /yPAtc f -VX - 2.//T-
Veer*.
ft*/ /ffobfa for ~~5tos£'n&?'+ 4/***. /Zj> Ji***- fiy,/ -/£ Mb* 7b &f" -JZg*?'/? *<*«•
i yi t J2* *P7*J1'/
/?*lSV ^4 w w^v ^
FILED IN COURT OF APPEALS 12th Court of Appeals District MAR 1 9 2015 TYLEn TEXAS CATHY S. LUSK. CLERK 75'" ^ fcMor.' 3^ YoiJ WVums .V. fafuJiH* X&fa far,*, I twee/. Z» «M 7-+/ p/x/,/c/ ^ ^ ^^ CoU>i/^ ^M3< ^, Q0~?~ ///0- /# FILED i.:^-JR] Uf APPEALS 12th C' u 1 ' "lycs's District
TYLE-. TEXAS CATHY S. l.lfSK, CLi
t\w T b<< rb\j ^ ,W ^c^'& '^" A""' 7A/ rehi/f* tV * i^(f+ o-fT /^W ftft\r\e/0\tr)*1S 1^ . / 0 / L; O U V. r
f 7^X
sf /nzmtt'i pf T/)ti>
/1/tvJ Iff*/- T yVJtorrL -27- 2012 "XesP'^o^ *
6* /J/7-/ " C*",t ^'f y/ -7* -^Ww A***' c<urt Ji,,^, C/--6 A'^ C*««. "" ,' ^•2 ^i/«r ()n /%£-'! 2&i*- TX C'**-\ of AppicI tfuhi'e/ -b/e
h l*fa <&4*k*4 M^ f" ***** 0r/ef sfzxhs fate //r/>t.lM<- ?'•*•/*»• A'* 3t fA) jr» -M nn 9/9+1*4 teuti of Tm:W t*»*+A Wsitrt +V< 3«i£"*«*•/- bU d^e.J^f ?*4 W /P'C'c*rK f/e* J«'''b b f^ \/k« ih fU -W.* aJ*+» ^4 f>« ***">*'*. /'/ »o)r pit* W^ t> bL 0-/VW o( bL 1**f* »M *****
&»* ^,^f^ P'/Js 7PJ r WClif gj9 fifc, £„'». 4/^ /*k)
/) /^W 0r$ 'fare OtAr 0f*% t^rtcf
p^ ft CtttittJ error /s ^ /^ ^ ^^ * iter'*/ 0r {i ^ _^ -port* of U~ %^ ^ It </. tut r><+ oS firr*". 4« ^cSP/At %.^^u bt'U«-* «*-* * *" r" *u "r'fil ' fbTr Pr.n /If/ /???' (0n'$/4*i jMOze</h) I**- LsuH ftu/e*/ &« Or/*? lr*«i'<£ * /fib** /&*>**- ft* /flt*t. &i»S J?e/J •'bZi -b/t. b*'/*'*- 0% & 7''*/
£*—^&f fan error q£ of \vt*t<t>*t Wvultv** /e^r^^. -/•/!«. Coui-j- rt^p,cj -hU Ltc*«s^ -//• Ac-fa ^' w*S«+->> "j«4~,*>+ s^ £>/>*/'* A Iff *" ** fjfa fa* ff/s /*>**) , ^ ,
/*/*<**6h*j y^k V^, M~ <{**/»". o( J** £**>+ iu Co*?p/j f\ C,Ar/S*reS C CUr/ccl *(**, n 3.
Witt /W ^ *rs"t ^:// ^ fa*****- h fU'^&f- f'4 f's Of/'r -^ CcJsn/oe/ -/£.
*&*L*a: ortc 441 4L ^ p*t,/,+ Cm U„d Lift*>- -7% Cmi + 0-f -yV* Jt<A*rtj o-f ~//i Z5i>*fr'»**t J Qt4« 41.4 JL 7# P/fffot tfu'-r h «Jf<'*£4 Aibr^e^ b ftj**cse*f bL rtAfar (u< a A*Arfy 0* S*£sr>?»i /V»*i /% fine, Of//<r Oa Mas a 26 _ 2^/r
H yo CAUSE NO. 007-1110-10
THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE 7™ JUDICIAL § VS. DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR § JQPY FORD MCCREARY SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS ORDERDENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT OF GUILT AND SENTENCE. MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL ARREST JUDGEMENT AND MOTION FOR JUDGEMENT NUNC PRO TUNG On the 22nd day of March, 2012, the above-entitled and numbered cause came before the * i Court for thpnurnocr ;>f D^te*""'0''1* IfwfvM-"^1.—,-i\~ **„+:.,„ i o.... A ,:.i . .1,.. t. 1 „ '•-,;;, ,„,; "V" Sentence, Motion for New Trial Arrest Judgment and Motion for Judgment Nunc Pro Tunc filed on March 15, 2012. The Court takes judicial notice of the Court's file herein and the evidence presented.
The Court finds that Defendant Jody McCreary's Motions should beDENIED.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Jody McCreary's Motion to Set Aside the Judgment of Guilt and Sentence, Motion for New Trial Arrest Judgment and Motion for Judgment Nunc Pro Tunc are DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed on this the 22nd day of Marcjx-2012 ( HGNO0&SLE KERRY^L. RUSSELL*! ludge, Th Judicial District Court ^inith County. Texas ! ?. J cc: Jody Ford McCreary TDCJ# 01694118 William G. McConnell Unit > ? ?ni2 3001 South Emily Drive Beeville, TX 78102 CLERK n JilHV. SMITH CO., TX BY _DEPUTY
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.