Darryll Johnson and Penny Johnson v. Liberty County and Juan Zavala
Darryll Johnson and Penny Johnson v. Liberty County and Juan Zavala
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-15-00410-CV ____________________ DARRYLL JOHNSON AND PENNY JOHNSON, Appellants V. LIBERTY COUNTY AND JUAN ZAVALA, Appellees _______________________________________________________ ______________ On Appeal from the 253rd District Court Liberty County, Texas Trial Cause No. CV1509179 ________________________________________________________ _____________ ORDER On October 7, 2015, the trial court signed an interlocutory order, which identified a controlling question of law that may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation, and granted permission to appeal. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(d) (West 2015); see also Tex. R. Civ. P. 168. On October 9, 2015, Darryll Johnson and Penny Johnson filed a petition for permission to appeal from the interlocutory order. See Tex. R. App. P. 28.3(a).
Juan Zavala filed a response. See Tex. R. App. P. 28.3(f). Liberty County did not file a response. On October 30, 2015, the Johnsons filed a motion for a temporary order staying the interlocutory order pending the appeal. See generally Tex. R. App. P. 29.3. Zavala filed a response to the motion for temporary orders.
The Court grants the petition for permissive appeal of the trial court’s order of October 7, 2015. See Tex. R. App. P. 28.3(k). Notice of appeal is deemed filed as of the date of this Order. See Tex. R. App. P. 28.3(k). The record is due November 13, 2015. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1(b). The brief of the appellant is due twenty days after the record is filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). The brief of the appellee is due twenty days after the filing of the brief of the appellant. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(b). The Clerk of the Court shall file a copy of this Order with the trial court clerk. See Tex. R. App. P. 28.3(k).
Execution on the trial court’s interlocutory order granting Zavala’s motion for summary judgment is stayed until the trial court severs the claims not disposed of in the interlocutory order or issues a final judgment in the entire case, or until further order of this Court. See generally Tex. R. Civ. P. 622.
ORDER ENTERED November 3, 2015.
PER CURIAM
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.