David Eugene Ford v. State
David Eugene Ford v. State
Opinion
V/v/zs- I Dear <VA-/ 5. /i/3h Cksk •fcr A\nl Jhohto ft*' fAV&t&w oi Tiv^e ks Pflt Wv snoh~w fvr ^BilQXi^^jJjith my p*zuivu-z> leliv • Please -P7VU th ~hi% \&tt£/\ Ike /whin X pihJ k> -tk* 6bus\- o± criyyuirb^i ^ OY) /yfach /OiM)i^ thalr /neusihjj^i-e/jcJec1 ^ €ut LuLtk -the /J^ Cbu/i &f rfpp&th- 3L- w«o con$w>e<L t<5Vtfr>> Qc\y(\ \0 fi U> lrk> Yv\o\i**) ho, ^&L<^> <^^( ~~Th& enicyTpX pyiftco afyv -~3o^>e vV \*>\ty\ *k^ Pile o/\<L YY)OhV> ,>\ \e\K7 bux.|-v
_UP.T OFAPPEALS J (Li ~W* roj'TioTAppgalsDistrict Chiltonj 7X Tidp]
TYLER TEXAS XATHV S^USJ^CLERK, Court affCnmmrJ Aoperj k ;,. co IN COURT OF APPEALS lico^lH^oeaisDistnct Dear rifrk- CAT! -T' S. L*J^li^y ^~^l__fiia-^^^M^EIM teZ-J^Bl^Mdim^r npjfrsj,.,*,•.
-7/W ^v /j»W/ ,;/, ,VA. fat, &/,- ^^_ .OAi/in man jt-toKHl RECEIVEDIN a floach /JfuJ- /Sti^F, prfff (/rjj tt, Clerk 'Jd£& t g 7^/ ftlbkon for CX{pn<F,ion of limp, 4r> Pk Woken &RpJ*m)j No: Idrfc-OOlO^-CJS ~rt Thfi UXtri of Criminal Ao^fc
DAVID Q/jpw Fnzn v. /he Sizthe O-F T^yi^ From dppni am /g-A^vi^^ /rial fhuie- AVn, /fy- /£?<?/-/x?
O/TnM ./kW// yjion -for rx+P^,-™ aPJ.^+s, ak
^^^^^fif^jh^ sins,* -fa. /W She -G/^n, u J.. (he. 47p/?hr^s an*, mm;icM m 4hP /H& fhirkJ- C™,f4-nt
%3 &S& f/xx
• * > f - —•
-=ALl /1/fi/iO Em^/7^ Fnrd TeJCci* Dppnf-hhP/ti ot Crim/m/ Xuzhr^ 'IDC'S -37.Q •#. MftftM
CerhT,*™^ dt ,Sw^
>s
Q9M2£b>
<Q&W_£2£Q__ '/Ljl£5#J@sglii
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.