Rushing, Calvin Louise
Rushing, Calvin Louise
Opinion
PD-0430-15 NO. IN THE TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS .
EOELVED CALVIN LOUISE RUSHING COURT OF CRMIWAl APPEALS VS. APR 17 2015 THE STATE OF TEXAS ,\tâj t\ ^-^^.a^ (T^Q >;^M\3i rMUvw<j>B.<ui, ^il FROM APPEAL NO. 12-14-00112-CR TRIAL CAUSE NO. 2012-0431 FILED IN ANGELIA COUNTY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS APR 17 20^5 APPELLANT'S MOTION REQUESTING SUSPENSION OF TEXAS RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, Abel Acosta, Clerk RULE 9.3[b]
TO THE TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS: Comes now, Calvin Louise Rushing, hereafter styled as the, Appellant, who in accordance with Texas Rules Of Appellate Pro cedure, Rule 2, and hereby request The Texas Court Of Criminal Appeals will suspend operation and/or application of the required number of copies of Appellant's Pro-Se Petition For Discretionary Review pursuant to Texas Rule Of Appellate Procedure, Rule 9.3[b]; As Appellant will argue and show unto The Court as follows: I.
The Appellant, Calvin Louise Rushing, is a Texas Department Of criminal Justice-Institutional Division inmate ,#1925565, held in confinement at The Allen B. Polunsky Unit [3872 FM 350 South- Livingston, Texas 77351], serving a sentence of fifty[50] years.
II.
The Appellant, Calvin Louise Rushing, at all times hereto mentioned during his trial before the judge and during the direct appellate appeal process has been and has remained indigent having executed a sworn and valid proper pauperis oath declaring his indigency to that effect on file in this case.
III.
The Appellant as a Texas prison inmate does not receive nor earn any monetary funds for his imprisonment or hard labor; And neither does the Appellant as a prison inmate has access to any copy machine nor printer to duplicate the required number of copies of his Pro-Se Petition For discretionary Review; Further more, Appellant is without family or friends available to copy or print up the necessary number of copies of his Pro-Se Petit ion For Discretionary Review; Therefore, Appellant request The Court to 'Suspend* the rule requirement of Texas Rule Of Appe llate Procedure, Rule 9.3[b].
IV.
CONCLUSION WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant, Calvin Louise Rus hing, respectfully prays The Court to Suspend-Operation- of Texas Rule Of Appellate Procedure, Rule 9.3[b], to which relief Appell ant humbly accepts.
LOUISE RUSHING TDCJ-ID# 1925565 ALLEN B. POLUNSKY UNIT 3872 FM 350 SOUTH LIVINGSTON, TEXAS 77351
-2- V. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Calvin Louise Rushing, hereby certify that a copy of Motion Requesting Suspension Of Tex. R. App. Proc, Rule 9.3 [b], has been mailed by U.S. Postal Service on this 13th day of april , 2015, addressed to: Cathy Lusk, Clerk , 12Th Court Of Appeals 1517 WEST FRONT STREET, STE# 354 TYLER, TEXAS 75702
-3-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.