Hernandez, Santiago
Hernandez, Santiago
Opinion
. ~ls~-02 l Trial.Court No. 2010~CRM-682-D3
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS THROUGH THE 49th JUDICIAL. DISTRICT COURT OF WEE COUNTY
Santiago Hernandez vs. The State of Texas
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
Santiago Hernandez #1689972 Daniel Unit S. Ff1 1673 Snyder, Tx 79549
Pro Se Litigant RECrE~VfED ~N ©OOftT ~ CRrt\lliNAt APPEALS JUN 09 20t5 ,\
Facts
1. Applicant Hernandez, filed a subsequent writ pursuant to art 11.07 sec- tion 4 with the Webb County District Clerk, 2. This application was filed over 60 day's ago.
3. The application does not challenge the conviction or sentence.
4. However, it requested that the court contact the. Parole Board and TDCJ- ID to correct their files since his plea agreement stipulated there would be no deadly weapons findings.
5. Applicant has already exhausted both remedies by contacting the parole board and TDCJ-ID vli th no avail.
6. The Assistant district Attorney for Webb County claimed estoppal since applicants claims are true.
7. After 60 days they still have not sent the records to the Court of Criminal Appeals.
STATE The State has 15 days from the date of filing to respond to the writ. ' After their time limit, they finally responded on April 15,2015.
COURT The trial court then has 20 days to respond. They have refused to do so. DISTRICT CLERK Upon the experation of both the State and Courts time limits, it is the District Clerks Obligation to fo~>Jar-d the file to the court .of Criminal Appeals.
The Order of Legal Process is in violation.
COURT OF CRHUNl1.L APPEALS Applican.t Hernandez, request that this court euvoke it's authority and order the district Clerk of Webb County, Texas to foward the record to this Honorable court. l. .\
Date: - - - - - - - - · Respectfully,
Santiago Hernandez #1689972 Daniel Unit S.FM 1673 Snyder, Tx 79549
2.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.