Shonda Lee Moxley v. State
Shonda Lee Moxley v. State
Opinion
RBCEIVED NOM 1 8 2015 SbUOND D'lSTRICT OF TEXAS DEBRAJSPISAK, CLERK (W^ 0* AoQgcds OO , l^W^n Aa&fl : S W-W ^t^JuAlclcil v& £ b^fxef- Gy-a-v- c£ 1jlTKc <Mftlc ofTe#u_ „J> iarrcucr Co^k^. 3tc^is AJlcrfinfN -fcor ScL\ 'PkryWa -Ac^vriJ To^Vic.^kcrtxbUr , \uAc)y> o* .cmA f^jr4-\ (ajwS P&-* ; ,SV\Of>Afl ^Ari^j -A-pf^AlflLicf- ^r?v s^a ny\ 4 aM-|fwi.a rrfr 1coo ua -tWe aWw*;:-cs^^A pinrl t\(tft/vh*rvJ Cause, a^A r^s(y/±fal\(j: rv\6v/es 4v^ Is^n- -fro opou/fr bcbd ftwW^- app6^\ s\A-.Si>rM cau^ po.rsvAa^ ~K> -(Vt ^4.ft4; iK/fts C>C« P-, fta A V 5>uopor-fc of-\Ws «Vrj^/aA ^ouA-A SWo Uftfa *"\K* Cfc^H- 11S -TdWooj^ ' X pp£J\ad: lis Cu^t:(ct\<j..rrs/yfiAgd un -j~Vu> Wr«u^ (c^uvfu .Wh av\r\ tens. avwicfg^ iVi j-Vyg. jg2£J TSsrtfxc* C.Q.^r-f o£ j-1A rrftjcV' G* ^cv^"ly >y^s t && ~^V^ .<^C^c\Scl rrf AWfe^? js>Qo In CfrUte pp. Hi^n 1->J m^svyry^ ^ni^gb. aAci q,s^^ / r
CV SeMervOL of 4 t^an: CgP^^^/va^ ^. The- \icia 4»enAfr\cg v^rv^- ptTMTteAjLjtfNc^iA >rv usm*s±, cs^n flfrtriV-w S3> £fos -jr .
Dr\ Mofewbpr 4^SqiS, Ap^yAWrct -fiM a&iUe. of o.ppmi IvO-\V^ Cat^, -Acjsp-^ <yf Sv<S^-»\c>-Ka ^s CeH^cAa g?4 IfVrcfc I ft^ f-V^VaV A o»nr\ ifYVicip, a. fv»-rfc rv(- ^VtXu iy\oVfto,;v Aor cA\ ^yTpc&fcS, JH_ ^ejiJ\3_pfQOis^iHW \"o Cigvrr: erf -ty-ua, -bsdr -\W -\\\j> SaAVnr £ JlSt
~ikL AfrPfAU^ \)Q^_L£^lj^g^_vi_oci JiMrA vinA»r S^ciirJ.^ Cn.V\\i •vvr p, {\oW- rr'imt* ]_Qrv!i IVvrc tM>Ce.. no ag^r&.ucch«vj -finrhvj ir\vrWt ~WV. Offi-A^C^l^feo^rvnV VYA,S Po OuK-V, rrW W^A\ EL \\cw\V V\(^ j±L£ ft'fcx.xrce^ gy\A' <s ^aiw 4^ post \W-.A \a ike O^cx^fV r£ >3>SfoP^^uUr\ Q^^jLkA !Q^aa ^tffir^^k^ vAcWt
\ Vv- 4firfe Ao vxcfr vSvaoun -^-Ucdr -iW "Ao^AU/vi ^ ^v
U\f\\jY<Ua to appr^ir» 'Rtx^gx :^Ap L&ujci 0t£JJa^ da j-Vu* ihaaaLjC^^ S^^^bq^ \
M-r4^fefevCck^5t .£co-i&.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.