@'w,zzs-oz To Clerk of Court of June, 2015 Criminal Appeals of Texas ` ' P.O. Box 12308, Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711 ' RE: Petitioner, Response to State'S Supplemental Answer to Applicant's Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Requesting for Out-of-Time-Appeal.

Trial No. 11-CR-1517-G, James Hinojosa VS. The State of Texas. .Dear Clerk, En¢iosed*, you will find a copy of the above metioned document, Please file this and bring it to the attention to court, copies have been forwarded by U.S. Mail to all parties, Also, could you please Send me notice of filing with Date-Stamp on this letter and return a file copy to me at my address' below.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR VERY KlND CONSIDERATION AND EXPEDITIOUS REPLY CONCERNING THIS MATTER.

Si cerely, cc/File JH/jm 4 ; \Sgnegbginojoéa`_~’) 319th` Judi¢ial District_court, TDcJ-ID# 1807828 District Attorney'S 0ffice ' Coffield Unit Nueces Co. Courthouse 2661 F`M 2054 Tennessee Colony, Texas 75884 RECEIVED IN . couRT oF chmNALAPPEALs JUN 29 2015 Abe§Acosia,Clerk IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS lN AUSTlN, TEXAS Writ No. Trial No.ll-CR-1517-G EX PARTE JAMES HINOJOSA IN THE DlSTRlCT COURT 3l9th JUDICIAL DlSTRlCT NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS (/.`/3(/.`/)</"/>.

Petitioner, Response to State's Supplemental Answer to Applicant's Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Requesting for Out-of-Time-Appeal.

To The Honorable Justices of The Court of Criminal Appeals.

Now Comes, James Hinojosa, petitioner and submits this said motion in response to Statels General Denial. The petitioner, Request for Out-of-Time, Appeal has merit, that would entitle petitioner, to relief.

I.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE The petitioner entered a plea of not Guilty to the Offense of Aggravated Kidnapping, and the Jury found the Defendant Guilty, and Sentenced to Fifteen years Confinement to Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division.

Il.

REASONS FOR NOT TO DENY THIS WRIT FOR AND OUT;OF-TlME-APPEAL The State has failed to offer any evidence that the petitioner, Knowingly and Voluntarily Waived his rights to Appeal. See: The attached State's Exhibit (1), The Judgment will show that their is no Signed Waiver of Appeal.

On page 4 of the State's supplemental answer it stated that applicant, lacks credibility, and that he waited three years to bring this claim to the court.

On the 8th of February, 2013 , The applicant send a letter to the Honorable Judge , Thomas Greenwell, of the 319th District Court, the Judge FAX'S the letter to Trial Attorney Mr. Mark Gonzalez , 4/5/13, See; The attached Exhibit (2) The Letter send to the Judge. The petitioner did make an inquiry to the status of his appeal. See: The attached Exhibit (3) State's Motion to Compel Applicant's Trial Counsel to Respond and to set Deadline for receipt of Affidavit., See: attached Exhibit (h) Mark Gonzalez,Affidavit which states that he consulted and advised the petitioner of the process of a Request for an out of time appeal ,Why would Trial Attorney suggest to the petitioner to file for out of time appeal, so why would Trial Attorney suggest such a thinggwhy not give notice of appeal. lll.

Exhibit (5) Motion To Supplement and Amend The Original Application For Writ of Habeas Corpus, Requesting for Out-of-Time-Appeal.

Supplement and amend Ground One: Trial Attorney failed to render effective assistance of counsel by failure to give notice to Pursue an Appeal.

Supplement and amend Ground Two: The Trial Court Failed to protect the defendant right to meaningful and Full Direct Appellate Review which Denied him Access to Courts.

EVIDENTIARY HEARING IS NEEDED This case raise the question of the right to appeal, evidentiary hearing is necessary in addressing thess issues if he was or not admonish by the court of his right to appeal, and if counsel gave notice of appeal or not, also if the petitioner Signed a Waiver not to Appeal.

CONCLUSION Wherefor Petitioner, summits his Response to State's Supplemental Answer to Applicant's Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Requesting for Out-of- Time-Appeal, and Decide the issuse in a just and fair manner and Grant the petitioner such relief the Law Permits, In the Interest of Justice.

R pectfully Submitted ¢;,'

etitioner, Pro.Se James Hinojosa TDCJ-ID# 1807828 Coffield Unit 2661 F M 2054 Tennessee Colony,Texas 75884 INMATE'S DECLARATION I, James Hinojosa, am the petitioner and being presently incarcerated, at the Coffield Unit, 2661 F M 2054, Tennessee Colony,Texas 75884, declare under penalty of perjury that according to my belief, the facts stated in this Response to State's Supplemental Answer to Applicant's Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Requesting for Out-of-Time-Appeal, are true and correct to the best of my knowledge.

Sig ed on l idune,ZOlS §

ignature of Petitioner.'t..

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This is to certify that on _lfi_dune, 2015, that a true and correct copy of this Response to Supplemental Answer to Applicant's Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, has been mail to Court of Criminal Appeals in Austin,Texas and 319th Judicial District Court, also the District Att rney's Office Nueces Co. Courthouse, By U.S. Mail postage paid. ;; §§ ` ‘ gégnaiure of Petition§?__“/I`

STATE’S EXH|B|T

t,¢ms.+ 1

CASE NO. 11-_CR-lBl7-G CoUNT SINGLE INCIDENT No./TRN: 9192800823

THE STATE oF TEXAS § IN'THE 319TH DISTRICT v. 7 § CoURi‘ JAMES HINoJosA § NUECES CoUNTY, 'rExAs sure ID No.: TX06185441 §

JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION BY JURY `

Judge Presidmg: . §§E§};£VEML‘SL F' §;::r‘;‘;§gme“t 8/1/20 12 Ammey for state JoE MIKE PENA ' §:*f‘;“§§’nf‘j’ MARK GQNZALEZ Ofi`ense for which Defendant Convicted: AGGRAVATED KIDNAPPING Charging Instn'ument: " Statute for 'OHense: , INDICTMENT 20.04 Penal Co'de Date of Offense: ` 5/4/2011 Deg;ee of Offense: Plea to Offense: lST DEGREE FELONY NOT GUILTY Verdic`t of Jpg: ' Findings on Deadly Weapon: GUILTY ' . ~ YES, A FIREARM Plea to 1st Enliancement Plea to 2mi Enhancement/Habitu Parag'raph: - TRUE Paragraph: - 7 N/A ' Findings on 1st Enhancement Findings on 2“d Paragraph: TRUE Enhancemeni/Habitual Paragraph: N/A Punished Assessed by: Date Sentence Imposed: Date Sentence to Commence: JURY 8/1/2012 8/1/2012

P“”ishme”* a”f‘ Pla°e FIFTEEN (15) YEARS INsTITUTIoNAL DIvIsloN, TDCJ ' of Coniinement.

THIs sEN'rENcE sHALL RuN CONCURRENTLYWITH 11-CR-3354-G, 11-CR-3219-G OF NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS, AND FEDERAL CASE NO. 2:120R00163-001.

E] sEN'rENcE or coNFINEMEN'r sUsPENDED, DEFENDANT PLACED 0N comleer sUPEvasloN FOR N/A .

Fine: Court Costs: Restituticn: Restitution Payable to: $ 2,000.00. $ '~\ LO\-\ ,OO s N/A ' l:l VIcTIM (see below) ij AGENcY/AGENT <see belbw)

Sex O£fender Reg`istration Requirements do not apply to the Defendant. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. chapter 62.

The age of the victim at the time .of the offense was N/A . lf Defendant is to serve sentence in TD CJ, enter incarceration periods in chronological order.

309 ~ OQ\[S From to 4 From , to From to Time_ From to From to From to Crechted: lf Defendant is to serve sentence in coung{ jail or is given credit toward fine and costsl enter days credited below.

DAYS NOTES: ` - All pertinent information, names and assessments indicated above are incorporated into the language of the judgment below by reference.

This cause was called for trial in Nueces County, Texas. The State appeared by her District Attorney.

Counsel lWaiver of Counsel (select Le_) ` § Defendant appeared in person with Counsel. l:l Defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived the right to representation by counsel in writing in open court. lt appeared to the Court that Defendant was l'nentally competent and had pleaded as shown above to the charging instrument Both parties announced ready for trial. A jury was selected, impaneled, and sworn. The INDICTMENT was read to the jury, and Defendant entered a plea to the charged offense The Court received the plea and entered it of record. ' 11-15\7@ Hn~:oqosA ' rage inn

l The` jury heard the evidence submitted and argument of counsel The Court charged the jury as to its duty to determine the guilt or innocence of Defendant, and the jury retired to consider the' evidence. Upon returning to open court, the jury delivered its verdict in the presence of Defendant and defense counsel, if any. .

The Court received the verdict and ORDERED it entered upon the minutes of the Court.

Punishment Assessed bv Jurv / Court / No election (select one) § Jury. Defendant entered a plea and filed a written election to have the jury assess punishment The jury heard evidence relative to the question of punishment The Court charged the jury and it retired to consider the question of punishment After due deliberation, the jury was brought into Court, and, in open court, it returned its verdict as indicated above. [:l Court. Defendant elected to have the Court assess punishment After hearing evidence relative to the question of punishment the Court assessed Defendant’s punishment as indicated above.

I:l No Election. Defendant did not file a written election as to whether the judge or jury should assess punishment After hearing evidence relative to the question of punishment, the Court assessed Defendant’s punishment as indicated above.

The Court FINDS Defendant committed the above offense and ORDERS, ADJUDGES AND DECREES that Defendant is GUILTY of the above offense The Court FINDS the Presentence Investigation, if so ordered, was done according to the applicable provisions of TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 42.12 § 9. - The Court ORDERS Defendant punished as indicated above. The Court ORDERS Defendant to pay all fines, court costs, and restitution as indicated above. .

Punishrnent Options (select one) _ ® Conf'xnement in State Jail or Institutional Division. The Court ORDERS the authorized agent of the State of Texas or the Shen`ft of this County to take, safely convey, and deliver Defendant to the Director, Institutional Division, TDCJ. The Court ORDERS Defendant to be con§ned for the period and in the manner indicated above. The Court ORDERS Defendant remanded to the custody of the Sheriif of this county until the Sheriff can obey the directions of this sentencer The Court ORDERS that upon release from confinement Defendant proceed immediately to the PAROLE DlVlSION, TDCJ. Once there, the Court ORDERS Defendant to pay, or make arrangements to pay, any remaining unpaid tines, court costs, and restitution as ordered by the Court above. ` I____\ County Jail-Coni§nement/ Coanement in Lieu of Payment. The Court ORDERS Defendant immediately committed to the custody of the Sheriff of County, Texas on the date the sentence is to commence. Defendant shall be confined in the County Jail for the period indicated above. The Court ORDERS that upon release from confinement Defendant shall proceed immediately to the . Once there, the Court ORDERS Defendant to pay, or make arrangements to pay, any remaining unpaid fines, court costs, and restitution as ordered by the Court above. ` ij Fine Only Payment. The punishment assessed against Defendant is for a FINE ONLY. The Court O_RDERS Defendant to proceed immediately to the Ofiice of the County . Once there, the Court ORDERS Defendant to pay or make arrangements to pay all fines and court costs as ordered by the Court in this cause. - Execution l Suspension of Sentence (select onel g The Court ORDERS Defendant’s sentence EXECU'I_'ED. . l:l The Court ORDERS Defendant’s sentence of conEnement SUSPENDED. The Court ORDERS Defendant placed on community supervision for the adjudged period (above) so long as Defendant abides'by and does not violate the terms and conditions of community supervision The order setting forth the terms and conditions of community supervision is incorporated into this judgment by reference The Court ORDERS that Defendant is given credit noted above on this sentence for the time spent incarcerated Furtherrnore the followin s ecial findin sor orders a l :

Pursuant to article 42.12, Section 3 g, Code of Crirninal Procedure & HB156 (77R) the court affirmatively finds that the Defendant used or exhibited a deadly weapon, namely, a tireann, during the commission of a felony offense or during immediate flight therefrom or was a party to the offense and knew that a deadly weapon would be used or exhibited l Signed and entered on div§/LM/?L? Q&//Q A. . %W¢W JUDGE PRESIDING _ ' 11-1517G HlNOJOSA Page 2 of2 5* ~ . '~ ' . y j ` ' 'S "“’ steam if d “?“§ §§ x ‘ ' ,, P`LYLK wgas Y§,I.

Ex.hi b;‘l` '§`_ 11-CR-1517-1G ' ' _-

EX PARTE ` § IN THE DISTRICT COURT JAMES HINOJOSA § v 319th 'JUDICIAL DIST C§f"' . _ § _ o TDCJ ID # 1807828 _ § NUECE_S COUNTY, TEX.%§ n STATE’S MOTION ~TO COMPEL APPLICANT’S TRIAL COUNSEL -'I`Of 'RES'PONI_)'AND TO SET DEADLINE FOR RECEIPT OF AFFIDAVIT Cornes now the State of TeXas, by and through its Assistant District Attorney for the 105th Judicial District of TeXas and pursuant "to article ll_.07 ~Sec:tionj?>(b) of the Texas Code of_Criminal »Procedure, and flies its _Motion to 'Com_-pel Applicantis Trial Counsel to'Respond-and to Set _a Deadline for Receipt of counsel’s Affidavit in the above-styled application for Writ of habeas corpus. -In " support thereof, the_State would show the following: The Applicant,' James Hinojosa, filed the present application Which Was -_' received b`y the State on December 15, 2014' alleging ineffective assistance of counsel, Mark Gonzalez. tHabeas‘ Application. The State responded that it v needed and had requested an affidavit from counsel_addressing .the Applicant’sv ' t claims.- State’ s Answer. t l l On December 15, 2014, the State spoke With Mark Gonzalez and asked him ` -to provide an affidavit addressing the Applicant’ s claims. Mr. Gonzalez said he Would provide that affidavit The State left copies of the application as Well as an- interrogatory listing the lssues that required his response at the front desk of the ' -Nueces County District Attorney-’ s Offlce.

On December 29, 2014 the State spoke with Mr. Gonzalez who said that he had forgotten to do the affidavit because of the holidays. Mr.- Gonzalez promised that he would submit the affidavit by th_e end of the week. _ On January 6, 2015 the trial court entered an Order Designating Issues (ODI) to be resolved, namely whether the Applicant had presented a cognizable and meritorious claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Order D.esigna_ting Issues. This ODI suspended all deadlines to allow time for submission of n counsel’s affidavit which is vital to the disposition of the Applicant’ s claims.

On January 8, 2015, the State attempted to contact Mr. Gonzalez to no avail. y 4 The State learned from a prosecutor that he would be in the 319th District Court at 1:30 PM. The State hand- delivered the application materials and interrogatories to k Mr. Gonzalez in the 319th District Court. l ' v On April 27, 2015, the State attempted _to contact Mr. Gonzalez to no avail. t The State left a message for'him. at his answering service.

7 l On April 2'8, 2'015, the State attempted to contact Mr. Gonzalez to no avail.

The State left a message for him at his answering service f ' On May 5, 20l5, the State spoke to Mr. Gonzalez and informed him that it had been several months since he promised to provide his affidavit and.also that the deadline for the Court to resolve all fact issues was only weeks away. Mr. Qonzalez said that he is in trial in the 347th District _Court all week so he will be at - v the courthouse and he will file that affidavit by Friday, May 8, 2015. 1 -O_n May 12, 2015, the State spoke with Mark Gonzalez who promised that he would turn the affidavit in tomorrow, May l3, 2015-l l On May l3, 2015, the State attempted to contact Mr. Gonzalez to no avail.

The State left a message for him at his answering service.

On May 14, 2015, the State attempted to contact Mr Gonzalez to'no avail.

Counsel’s number said his mailbox was full and could not take messages.

On May 15, 2015, the State`attempted to contact Mr. Gonza`lez to no.. avail. - The State left a message on his voicemail telling him that it was filing the present t motion, that it had been several months since he promised to provide an affidavit, and that we are out of time. _The State also left a message at his answering service. _ The State is unable to adequately respond _to the Applicant’s application ' without an affidavit from'Mark Gonzalez responding to-the Applicant’s claims of ineffective assistance The State has'made all efforts to secure a response from counsel, but it is now obvious that counsel does not intend to file his affidavit despite his repeated promises to do so. It has been almost 6 months since counsel promised to deliver the affidavit Because of counsel’s delay, the Court now only has until June 15, 2015, for counsel to have filed his affidavit, for the State to draft '_ l its Supplemental Answer utilizing that affidavit and making its recommendation to the Court, for the Court to resolve all fact issues, make its findings of fact conclusions of law and recommendations, and to deliver all materials to the Texas Court of Criminal_ Appeals for final disposition.- An order from the Court is needed to compel the submission of the needed affidavit by date certain, and the 'Sltate now asks that the Court order Mr. Gonzalez to_ respond.

Pra er Fort_he foregoing reasons, the State respectfully requests that the trial court: (l_) enter an order compelling attorney Mark Gonzalez to respond to the Applicant"s ineffective assistance claims; and (2) set a deadline for the submission _of his affidavit This motion is not sought for the purposes of delay but so that the Applicant’ s trial attorney may have the opportunity to respond to the Applicant’ s _ allegations and thereby enable the State ineffective assistance of counsel.' . . to answer the Applicant_’s claims of k Respectfully'submitted,' l //7% J ames Odell_ .

State Bar No.v 24063601` As"si_stant District Attomey » v105th Judicial District of Texas ` erE sTATE oF TEXAs, ' CoUNTY oF NUECES.

901 Leopard,-Room 206 , - Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 ` Telephone: (361) 888-041_0 Facsimile: (361)=888~0399_ _ Email: [email protected] AT_ToRNEY FoR THE STATE _ BEFORE _ME, the undersigned authority,' on this day personally appeared J ames Odel'l who, being by me duly sworn, .did on his oath depose and say that he is an attorney for thev State in_ the above-styled"proceedings, that'he has read the foregoing vState’s Motion, and that the facts stated therein are true and correct to _the best of his knowledge and belief,

James OLdél '\ sUBsCRlBED AND sWoRN ro BEFoRE ME On the L;j’~d`ayjof May, 2015, _ _

lDA G. RANGEL _~‘ e.-" '-\c> '-. . _s 1_ Notary Pubhc -._ z ,~ sTATE 0F TExAs "Zi',¥w€t\*”¢ My Comm. Exp. _10~25-2016

` §

Not_ary Public, State of Texas

cERTIFicATE oF_ sERvIcE l hereby certify that a courtesy copy of the foregoing 'State’s' Motion was delivered to support staff this § day of May, 2015, to be mailed to the Applicant pro `se: * ` James Hinojosa _' TDCJ ID # 1807828 ' H. H. Coffield Unit , 2661 FM 2054 t ' Tennessee Colony,-TX 75884 1 Via First Class`U.S. Mail »

Jamesf)dell

- sTATE's Exuiarr '

iE><\-tibi'i Ll AFFIDAVIT OF MARK A. GONZALEZ MAY 27 2015 STATE OF TEXAS § § v D NUECES couer lSTmcr ATTo ' COUNTY OF NUECES § “NEY S OFF|CE MARK A. GONZALEZ, appeared in person before me today and stated under oath: "My name is MARK A. GONZALEZ, I am above the age of eighteen years and I am fully competent to make this affidavit On Cause No. 11-CR-1517'-G; State of Texas vs. ]am-es Hinojosa; by Signature below I MARK A. GONZALEZ state that I consulted and advised Mr. Hinojosa the process of a Request for an out of time appeal and provided information With regards to the potential witness Jerry Winterroth: o I consulted with Mr. Hinojosa the meaning and effect of the judgment rendered by the court; I informed Mr. Hinojosa his right to appeal the judgment; informed Mr. Hinojosa the process in filing an appeal and the importance of filing the notice in a timely manner; Mr. Winterroth was available to testify; Mr. Winterroth’s testimony would not have been beneficial to the defense in this case; Mr. Winterroth’s testimony would have been detrimental to the defense of this case.

1 further state that Jerry Winterroth was a co-defendant and by law I could not call him as a

witness to testify because he would have plead his rights to the Fifth (5"‘) Amendment.

The facts stated in this affidavit are within my personal knowledge and are true and correct. …»DM/ MARKA.\G€SNZALEZ y A SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME by the said MARK A. GONZALEZ, on this the 214 day of (MC\A , 2015, to certify which witness my hand and seal of tro §§ Notary Public, in and for office.

VELMA SANTOS My Commission Ex'pi_res Fenmary 23 2018 The State of Texas

Exhbt 5 ll-CR-1517-G C/`./?

EX PARTE IN THE DISTRICT COURT JAMES HINOJOSA n 3l9th JUDICIAL DISTRICT !£/J(/'_/J NUECES COUNTY,TEXAS .;.; ",: ..;_ M .»,»` ." v “‘»;"..;:'..;: `»»'€; ~;:,; ;,: .,; .»;.;", ',. ;.; ",: n '..;.:;`: ",`_,:>:;:,,.;",`,` , ,.i ;:_.:, “..:.~.`,.`.`,_AM.,_A( ._.;>:a;',..;~ .: '5'.:," ,-.,<.1:~::.::.__,'..';` .:'.'.~'.\ ,~.:

Petitioner, Motion To Supplement and Amend The Original Applicat1on For Writ of Habeas Corpus, Requesting for Out- -of- -Time-Appeal. ' To The Honorable Court of 319th Judicial District.

Now Comes, James Hinojosa, petitioner and submits this motion to supple+ ment and amend the original application for_writ of habeas corpus,-requesting for Out-of-Time-Appeal.

I.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE The petitioner entered a plea of not Guilty to the Offense of Aggravated Kidnapping, and the Jury found the Defendant Guilty, and Sentenced to Fifteen years Confinement to Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional l Division. ` SUPPLEMENT AND AMEND GROUND ONE: Trial Attorney failed to render effective assistance counsel by failure to give notice to Pursue an Appeal. c FACTS sUPPoRTING GROUND ost The petitioner will explained and show why,'petitioner, should be allowed. for Out-of-Time-Appeal. The petitioner is layman of the Law and can't be held to the same standard's as licensed attorney: Even though a defendant who has pleaded not guilty has an absolute right to appeal under Article AA.OZ, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, 'Counsel, whether retained or appointed he has the responsibility to make sure that the defendant is aware of his appellate rights.

GROUND ONE CONTINUES: ln our adversary system of Justice, the Lawyers and Judges, by the very ' nature of their duties, find daily partnership in this quest for Justice. lt is their joint professional responsibilities to see that an orderly appellate process is achieved. No accused should be denied his right of appeal, Justice requlres that the exerclse of h1s right o§ appeal must be held within frame _S;rm: work of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. , See: Morris Vs. U. S. 503 F. Zd. 457, 458, 459 ( 5th.C1r.1974 ), stating that a direct appeal from a criminal conviction is a matter of right.

The court reporter's records should so reflect; If Trial Attorney gave notice of appeal in open court or not. See: Chapman Vs. U.S. 469 F.Zd.634-(5th '_ Cir. 1972). The Court Ordered a hearing to see if the attorney had abandoned the defendant's appeal or neglected to inform the defendant that he had a right to appeal.

SUPPLEMENT AND AMEND GROUND TWO: _ The Trial Court Failed to protect the defendant right to meaningful and Full Direct Appellate Review which Denied him Access to Courts, FACIS ”SUPPORTING G_ROUND Wo: '"A`criminal'défendant“mmst'not`be`made“to“forfeit"substahtial"légalmrights"`“" inregard to an appeal. A thorough examination of the court reporter's records should indicate if the Trial Court Admonish the Defendant of his right to appeal. Failure to advise you of your right to,appeal, See: Thomas Vs.Betoz '423 F.Zd.642 (5th.C1r. 1970); Ex Parte Axelz 757 S.W.Zd. 369 (Tex.Crim.App.~" 1988). lf you were indigent and had a court-appointed attorney, the attorney or the Court must advise you of; (1) your right to appeal; (2) the procedure. and time limits involved; and (3) your right to appointment.of counsel on appeal if you are indigent. If the court reporter's records show, that he was 'denied, right to appeal, then he is entitled to appropriate relief in this Habeas Corpus Proceeding.

INMA'I'E' S DECLARATION I, James Hinojosa, am the petitioner and being presently incarcerated,_ at the Coffield Unit, 2661 FM 2054, Tennessee Colony, Texas v75884, declare under penalty of perjury that according to my belief, the fact stated in 1~="~"-~‘>\“»'*~'A'th'~i'~'s:~Mot:i”on‘"~To'~"Supp~“l'"emen't“and"§Ame`nd'“'"’l‘t“ré*"©r`i‘g"ina’l:"'App"l`icati"on"`“For-'“_Wfilt`""`"c`)‘f""“':"""‘*"`"`”"t'“`“""'“‘”:""'"”,"'" ‘ Habeas Corpus, Requesting for Out-of-Time-Appeal, are true and correct to the best of my knowledge.

Signed on / February , 2015

Signature of Petitl?)§r ,Pro . Se CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This` is to certify that on __]i_February,ZOl§, that a true and correct copy of the Motion To Supplement and Amend The Original ;Application For Writ of Habeas Corpus, Requesting for Out-of-Time-Appeal,,has been mail to the Clerk of the District Court of the 319th Judicial District of Nueces County, P.O. 7 v ' ~~Box~' 2987-~,~ Corpus ~Ghristi~,~ Tx‘ '7~8403~.` 'By "U'.S'. "Ma'i‘l~ postage "paidz ' ' j """" ' """" - """""" 1 ' ' ' Resectfully Submitted '\ _ `_¢ . _, " *__ ' . ' §titioner, Pro,Se

EVIDENTIARY HEARING IS NEEDED "Ihis case raise the question of the right to appeal, evidentiary hearing is necessary in addressing his issues if he was or not admonish by the court of his right to appeal, and if counsel gave notice of appeal or- not, ;.;;;_;“.;..;.;..'.;;',A;‘,._'.;.;.'.'_'..:;;....;:'_"_;L'._'_.'.._i'.;q.'§..";"`.`”‘»:>€».' , f ` .,. ,.. ‘.< »\ . fm . ti,_'.‘» {'1-;‘¢_ ",_,'..: ~ ,'.~;' ~:.;.` .:_1..;',:'*;.-.’i.?‘~_'.;`?~'»:.\~.;‘v..'::‘..".".',.._",J.T».'..C’,` ..` »".",; ,`.`.:»:;-;',;'.'.`_,~..` ,~`,C.-. »:`,` .~ ,.;",C',..”.».;'.€,`".~".-..'$:,~.i ncoNcLUsIoN Wherefor Petitioner, summits Motion To Supplement and Amend The Original Application For Writ of Habeas Corpus, Requesting for Out- -of-Time-Appeal, and Decide the issuse in a just and fair manner and Grant the petitioner such relief the Law permits, In the Interest of Justice Res ectfull Submitted

N . - . ` _.6/.¥./€.’€.11`-.10_11<:1;, PrOSe\-) , w _ ,, _, `_.

James Hinojosa _ TDCJ-ID# 1807828 Coffield Unit' 2661 FM 2054 .

Tennessee Colony, Tx.`75884