Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2015

Eric Samuel Tucker v. State

Eric Samuel Tucker v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided August 3, 2015

Eric Samuel Tucker v. State

Opinion

FILED IN

____^__ Ilr^y^ 30DXCJfip C^srRjcT Cwr iflfe 3twe of izxkt __ .. ^ _a£s ^ : J _^ XLXc&l s Tutkcd _____ cfegjKH-te-QQj^>,cjK,.

HqTIokI PqC ^fc fOLOjJ Hfej^r fejQJCSr To Ti^£ ^jaamJE 3J-5&E C&J3S CkJflr :

fcS \WtoJSSaoqjL, i^PUEA^^ PaSSSSasq

H KK^U UVfe Too<, PLRCfe ^ ^rIM^TxCAvw vjgj>n=Ti SosfrrcW JMk&l& f H Mfc&ftftt/J ^Caoztcra.^ va*\^&s the,- cst^se. umf? tt Tv^fe o^ __ W^ Sn^ aamm y ESjCP^j, l ">^>> Cgjj^j^CJ *mm* ^ 31

^•gfojSX^ ^Sft_ ^Efoviret (x UfcvtfoRire 'LAi4M Oks diiix^ qcct^s iCT^Rs) «>»,-rvMgte_s t^ ?&_*-<£ U^^lT) ^\^aife mV& t>iS^o:i->|) VfrteH tvfog^rr o^ utawfoi iJv) V*ftt*L5 Kter KltkN^T\ XW tJvvf Pfc»K€ .___

S^ y^ \^pr iv^_xvtTt . S^r Utgyg,.^^.uvA Xki i«ig; m-rui m£ M^rt

ivi^m^L_____^ sg^^s^^ yPACES' TV\f, P^^JTau :PMi.te ftiflSrtG. TRo^ Uxtk^ts -TEara^, ? ^ "frt_an OcvteGir-r )rT-rr(Ls _Sfe £&a $ Xr_ tA^fl A/totecy? fc<v C^ftWr tIiaC <S(^ of ins 'KKrrat. 3-4 •VgSftxLsr, Xtf5rEM> <_r ?^plx/:&k 1^4

SflS> CX\SA^S Potency• iJjstaLrfr,ifS^v t^r, C4ittef"u( favtt 3 vjovpjr KCo (3^C>)^tgiAT3b4-S>to>V Ovi^T^E- viryr CAUL >>> Cwls^rTvJ-TSWftj-- ftttiS3\J&E(j£ CtaKTNgsrGT) TUXs Pft^T )

fof.XiK X*. Ps N&JTftU ftjLflRfr fc •^Tf: 3 HTO-^H^-BPI.: _______ ________ LlST_, Tq TUr UxtmisSS ^ID Cgi) iter TftKE PiUTCAUiiohi To 3XS t-rtv^rr,$i

Apt P^-q^rr^K-Xktq k 3ftj> Pfr&T\j BfeXiic i^vbaCT *" _W _E -Cfr\rr__Jjtfq To Cte Rjy C^QKpr^»(. X4 fi^^^f1" fe"SXC*- . Xkj Ky >SNf STfoA To ^V^CX. ^ BL&3Q o^L TWsf^fl..

.31 ^_^^ fo^rrx-ujTs^i^o Pfl^Ai&rir, o4 >i<ssb_o_3 ls^su ; TQi^aisoTi vako^o^, i>h^ Pforrxric ^^CiVMa^r /\f€fttox fcSUcayf;

-^^>->: fe3 Psarfuiy SvlR(wriFO ffar. .S -MM1 flj___i_5 grri&r j___ fm 3y/</ BgyvjKwr Ty w?oj ^FSI- H^t I' ' CC r

* •

yj O ifl CL- v ip g£2? P. ULi oc ggl ' o <«5f o p«;ai; !'••• e^ r-

^8 3

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.