--;\Mg;&§) goss . ' , RE<;E:\/ED|N _ y - y ` z _ COJRTGFCR'WNALAPPEALS ' ‘ Asssllzm§ 33 555'0§ , Ab@m@@@%a,©i@§k

` ix €Q@M:,§ \<zg\@§§q

- Findings.

' ' ';i;""` § ‘ c § . m ms bzs'.jt'nrc_'r_ cover _ _ ;;_ x - _ § ` mann Jum':cm. ozsmrc'r l:.~'[A’pl.i.¢;am:*guns se] "1 _- TRAVI§ COUNTY, TEXAS

P§ICANT 8 OBJECT16N§ TD TR1A§ CGURT'S _ FINDINGS OF FAGT FOST 66 I6TIQN_AFPLI6AT 6N§1

H,Vf§bonald Aekine reoe£ved the Snete s Propoeed of Feot and Order to transmit Habeas Gorpue Reéof Applioant respeetfu11y 1odgea the following e;to those Findinge, as authorized by the Tx Ru1 T'R A Pa rule 73.4(1:))(2).,4 ` `18 2013, Applicenc filed with the Fourth 66 me (COA) a Motion for Extenoion 65 Time to File a Motionj£or Reheering. That Court granted Him an extension n February 19, 2014. These facts were not included in the Stat

. The Stete e Petition for biectet16naty Revtew filed on Deeember 12 2013, was filed prematurely because Applieent st 1¢ had pending litigation. The 4th 606 still had jurisdiction 6M6r

the ease, end on Februety 14 ,2014, he £1166 his Mot1on for 666 6;_992 Reheer£ng.; , q ~ ;,; In Applieent s M6t1on for Rehearing, he raieed e new issue ' as authorized bye T. R. A. ?» rule 493 Gebert v Stete 275 SWBdBSB; Rodri uez v State 129 8W36551(1£ a petty raise a new ground for- ‘the first time on Mo’ion for Rehearing, the GOA 18 not required to entertain, but argument 16 now preserved for PDR). 4 §» Applicant ergues that his conviction on Geunto 1 end 2 65 his indictment vielete the bouble Jeopatdy cleuee and poe Proeeae Cleuse of the Fi£th and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. 1 Constitution, against multipie convictions end punishments for the seme offense in a s1ngl¢ prooeeution. ' ' "”

Pege 1 o£.3

4 62 February 25,2924, App116622’s 926 se 262162 262 _,2 , veneering was devices 2210 2262 was not ineluded in the s2e2e’a 21661252.,_` en weren §,2014, 199116922 211ed 2 926 se 2621en 262 2x2en2162 of 2162 26 2116 a 262162 262 22 anne neeoneiderazion 6122 the 222 201 and 222 mhtien 662 gren2ed avail way 12 2914. : 22636 faete here 602 12616666 12 266 22226’ s 21ndiags2 , 222 Mozlon for 22 name neaon2 was 2626611y pla¢ed 12 2he ,_ ¢» prison mailbox en May 9 2014(266 2222216 21221n36#?)¢-;.221a 2662_' misstated 16 266 Stete a 216d163¢05. , . . 2 ' x ' on 263 29,2914, 199112222 filed an Amanded 926 se 262106 En 2622 22662. 6122 222 222 222 (226M1saue 2~2212'6 2622

123“6£ 122, pg 4). 2213 2662 was 662 12216696 in the 22a22's 21661236. 2"1 2 - Appl£¢ana 616 262 2262122 229 269121 02662 e£ 212 .~ pro ae. 262166 fox 22 2626 22692» until xey 22,2016 (aee 2223 1 Cennelly 2212 mailroom~"£neom£ng"bdgat 2211 295)2 Thia 2222 uae` ` ;“ `f“mis»oteted 16 266 2 2626’ a 212216827.'5 ;~ »5¥ ”V * App11¢ent 616 noe reaeive the dan£dl ozdee 62 hiaF 1222 " pro se 2621en for Eatonaion 62 2126 22 2112 e 292 22211

1-13June 21,2014. (a62 TDGJ 6622611y 2n12 mailneem»”lnaamivg Legal` ' 2221 zeg)caee also issue 2~2212*2 2222 22 222,% 243>.

2262 wee 616~622266 1a state’ s 21ndtngs¢96' _ ' 22 JUne 26 2014, 299116622 22620 266 262 26 explain 616 enziclemane 26 e 222 extension and 20 eubmi& a §ecggd pro se Metien 262 2226221¢2 02 Time to 2110 a 222, (aee 22h1b12 1)., This 2222 was 216»026266 16 Saeue’e 2126163292.

02 Novembe2 14,2014, 222 66222 sales 2222 229112222*2 pro 26 § y was 26621966 nnu&mely 62 duly 11,20142 2226162262, 262 TD€J “_ mailroom 222162212 and 22222'2 21261232#11, 2626 29112069 626€£ 1221166 Papeta 662 via 9.8. Pestal Seeviae en duly 1,2014.,,9’€ ' (see 2221212 2). Th1s 2222 was nos 1noluded 12 222 seate o .21221222~% v 1 '~ w y 2622 » 2 62 3

._ fn Verburgt v Dornar, the Court h§1d that "a m5t10n for _F§extension of time 1a necessarily 1mp11éd when an appellant act1ng Yin good§” faith £11ee, w1th1n the 15~day par1qd in which he wou1d be :`entihled 15 move to ext§nd the filing deadllns, documents showing a f"\_§ona f1de 1ntent to appeal.": Id 959 SWZd 615 617(Tex 1997); Gat! '» 2662 WL 1806866, at#1.f ; ' ' » z ` 5 In the instant ease, Applicant-acting 1n 1good‘ fa1th~£11ad 1'dur1ng the 15- -day entitlement to an extension(pnr T R A P. 66 2(¢)) 111 _.an Amended Mot1on for 6n Bdnc Reaon. (Juns 26 ,2014) and his pro se PDR(JuIy 1,2614)§ thus showing a bona fide*intent to Appeal just "deys after receiving the denial Otden 06 his extension request»6

"'!pRAyER y »z;;€¢, FOR THESE REASONS, thé App11oant neapecefully PRAYS the _Trial Court incorporate Applicant' s objections along with the Staee' s Findings of Fact and that the Trial Court recommend these coherent findings to the Court of Appaals; that based on vthese facts, App115ant be given permission to neaubm1t his pro se ' 'Petition for Discretionary Rev1ew. ,,’f: " .` ' d ' b :; . 4 ) .? ' Respectfu_liy submitted on this \the 5““ day of 1\\), 051

' App11cant pro ss- #1826499 ';__ l §J¢H}§¢ ,.

Connally Un1t ` :"§ 1;<36§;`@ §11¢}3;5 , 899 FM 632 § ` ‘ L'= v @;.j »`§@, &\n Kenedy, Tx_78119 _1;;1§* 1.3]_~§~:£:} } “

cca filg/da,Ttavie Cnty hist Clerk, Court of Cniqinal Appeals$V// f ~ FAQFL.;B 01'§3

_. CC: file £5`1!.`.'1 C_ERT|F|QAT|_E_ OF SERV_|CE

do hereby jrcertify that a_ true and correct copy of _the foregoing 1\111~;1,;»11§ 313 313§3 323 __ 1 3 :. 331-____ 11)335`§1\. 3 1111‘1;1§3}\11 551 `z`\ Q 1b ““{ §;1{1 ,\1\131,~1§>¢ 51 1__3_,3333;3‘ 33 has b`een forward by the U. S. mai|, postage paid,l f pst clas:§ to the /11)1)1. - 1 1111“§('£‘11 _}1~’ \111§\% {\113§111131 9115”0,1?2}%@1`1.1 'H{\'l f “§1‘11):\… :YX:;`:. mlmw 3§_' 1911 §‘_ 111111~1.~111111.‘131}\.1111‘\1>/.\)1~¢“1'\11\§§§11~1>»\1“`51 90“§;51"§!1 \11:'5~5(5{‘§ §11$1,){111¢135‘:1\3 ?3:'§ who shall serveacopyto thé: L§{§ 13111111§'11111 1153 1`1\1)011§1»§

1[ExECuTEDoNTHlsTHE §&`“- DAY'o`F 311113`113`1`3~§;_ -- ;201§5]- Respecrfuny submiued, .` 1\-»~\\_¢~1 1 "':33:"`)/11'\(1_1~ \[11 k §:551~»1 _P\ §

Appeuam- -TDCJ# ' _ 11#1'“1\111\`_,®§)11 z ` Unit'

INMATE's uNswoRN DEcL`ARATIoN I, Donald Aekins, am the applicant and being presently incarcerated in Texas Department of Crnninal Justice, declare under penalty of perjury that, _ according to my be1ief, the facts stated in the above application are true »and correct.

Under both Federal law (28 U. S. C. Sectlon 1746) and State law (V. T. C. A. Civ11 Practices and Remedies Code, Section 132. 001 - 132. 003), offenders incarceratedv in Texas may use an unsworn declaration under penalty of perjury in place of a "written declaration, verification, certlflcatlon oath or affidavit sworn before _, ff@;siff ““f a Notary Public. le‘ .g.

Respectfully Submitted on this the éday of 20`§§

"Appellant prop Connally Unit- FM 632'~' i. .H Kenedy, Texas,_78119