Shropshire, Rebekah Rachell
Shropshire, Rebekah Rachell
Shropshire, Rebekah Rachell
Opinion
9/9@//5 ‘ » §§\ W~M 3%1¢ C(MHL &m gamma 9mm 30 dw VU§\:€/klmfl sf\ §WWML ~\;z§§f \-/WMG\ ubvnl JrD J\jOQ/ 'M m (‘©(Y\O\\QDCQ L£)\Mn +L)L/VMS QWU\@§ (‘Y ;§… \_(\Q‘MFCU»§QA SGT.Y\QQQ}\ CL/
\\¢U¢\Q, ~\~\M,Q/ \_(\ icm )\.€MD l dnc/mw l C\lS©
M § gm w mw §)Q§ <*"RECE'VE°'" mm n n ')n15
l“|f'\l\ VC¢'= 'W\Cu”ll</ l k/\\L
Abe| A¢€)sta,¢ lerk
~'H/L/Q§z@/S '§LLDMM 3§»@@<§,,~ §@QM
w?\~ %\ \,"?3@\'~©3
fn C+. J\>@., ©w»l@//@}WL@B*C,
é?~QL/~ /5
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.