Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2015

Wilkerson, Senrick Shern

Wilkerson, Senrick Shern
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided March 19, 2015

Wilkerson, Senrick Shern

Opinion

rc F(\Ls ^ MtyfM&t&it Suck ^sf Mbm CMMsel n hdjje med greets)drtwettf Pro 5e (DrioincU fefCKorp &r oyi I (awswib (of le^Mchptoilte^ ao<iM\ AdWi h»3aknsa>ljh <*e Co/; /^rf i_. Mien Sfc6j»^fco^,^Cfl«im6we^ p^s^aeecA^w^f^iV^iCckcVi 6 proof*Uxkiekwftl^ t<vu feJK-Uan uiftV sucV\c^uu^,<sArtdl -nam tm^wMy ^wedi whm <kcomes

33NR\ ^K V$\U%3)<$®W

RECEIVED IN COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 2015

i, Clerk ^E_*. ProSe Oficjinci (Hfe for Le^ol /Wdlfimdrc^ /WisoU"

for ^ AtftoS^^^tlSlvete***fe$' HOT IU« i / , ^ WuWi^ a™^ pW2j wjtf. Idk

itf'I/ WIT m \/CC8^2.i3-3ti>} WAIT Mo% U^CKJU&V -"^-S IMAVT Ah iou>ou65-:j(/^

^PPL\OVorr pyre- ^"^Vlb TO THC HOlV3C^h^V£. JUSTICES OF 5^H0 CQUftX; (S^ltr^S. \ C^tS NXlXit<5eA^lAter^^1^e AfplKavA- herein^ wes* -Has pro se MsWon sWiu^ -W\e Causers. o3 felt^^Ds; rtaWsdai

tte,{^^^7 A^o-c*W-3(£} cAvvd uub^Ute-sM). bee :ihreG^ 137 f-

Ate ^rsVAvmA»*^^^^ mo^rV ($SW\^s (\V€,lvtQ)rrY^C9f\ ^eCohort offSk\flis wa< \Wprcee^ufe ^^°nQ^ pT€SGyr^e^ Ci^u^Mc&.HO^u^^o-ous^^b^i^/- &FU>ou&?5 befereany /%kWe ^r\s(^K^^ySyu

-rVve &A ^w3r we £\es ate <A\ss«\q 4iaus aiide/vifi.-\V\<id %totfuasdywa Aue process See- U& CcMsV,ftme«te,,VI,)UV)Tex.si flonsl^.l livo^l^us,^^

OW^&Sfi&^S^16 »1 "™ iLv^«A taUSe'**^ -VoTSJSf^d ^R.^P.^W^--^- ' AffAfcoA^Pf^H^WifeG^ m>^£ oAos,exjer ojeoessloA^A m^<mwA fee fl&ouoa s^oialpfer/n^cx^/a C\3A^tya\8s semi ^(Vm<mce.la/ aeklid,hocu8/ seaid ass«mlfok? aduJcl & mttltefowfe^o prc&wmbn» gulQ^gcy^ (A Dirpj*W }TDCj-\b ^rc^

A\rjo tm tc&cf*^'z_l '

«s^3)oP^ EXPIATE, xm oynAi-kji\L CiSTRtCT <UXJt&TM0,3

^FUCHXr^'fl<OPQseb HM&j^qf fact, Ayr-U^rigCFlj^/WC> Qf&gft \. Po^e SLoP 4te ^M*ls Response oUexps aSed-von V, w+kW U«07 J»r fc fc tosta)*

rearing u>nUpll<^^s1^ feHfe •£ ^VkV? tyeCwVia) acpliatfiort rcasss dooms r6^o#i^Ulildf(y o^4Viep^smwo»i or\ucU)griJ-of^.14-tevu^opdy to cidws DawMftsSi^dicrfon Is ofthxt& ty »A«»i Hteeto&Mi&m

ar^&A of^Avtiw/ V)e(^4\^ele)CAS iour^cf ChmiV) Appoak,&i4rky \/,SUe ^S/Y^tTOC. ftpp."El Aco,W4,no pd\Seel^reCaVn OTK 3d 23«/, ZaBtS^tfr, ^^eay^is tMte^^ anaAroP4*rn€ app9a\ aoiy^ind^^e Oonuick/l

1m\ eiw^cjeA^^*^^ ifresolve} w the 5\t^scVY^mj^^vTDfey\ c$P ^eGmivJr, ^*l^^ ,-i -•-(/ g^qto&o^ cfbi*fealty^ be^^(Wfe vtf^undy fesfw^rhutyis sWafcruy

V^J^evxffr\QA.<iS o^k^vAUy 6roK^aA: Mefrxe**/ IK (jotfe H^^26 U57CSr*a>, TONceA

Rosk5urorij"T%77S63

^ n ^ c k . oo»\u<a^5Gi^

"The <Jta^Nc&ci\ \s W^bu: (cptiifcked^ (ajerouled)

-^ux^e.

pc^e Zcf 2^

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.