/\’:`>,”l" l'@"?

Mr. Kevin Terrel1 Tatum Mareh 12, 2015 TDCJ #1409740 1 varyingtzu Unit harrington Rd. Roshazon, Tx.» 77533 f TEXA»B CGURT OF ‘CRIMIN.R».L L?PEAL,S jggyna~Hon. Abel hcaata.»¢lerk ”3.3. 303 12333¢ Capital`Station Au$$fn,'?x. 78711 aec Cauae No. 11¢111~§7; Tr. Ct. No. 1042§08~§: ENGLOSED ”PET!TIQH 333 REQUBST 333 RE3G’UTL 33 `CLAIMS' 336 “AFPOINTMENT 03 COUNSEL* heat Court Clerké Enclosed, please find an original copy of P3tit10n3r'3 "REQUES? 303 'I'HF- RE$OLU?ION 03 311?‘113£3", 310$1;;'- with "A?PBINTMFNT OF COUNSEL“. 11133 pursuant to the above sty1ed n.d numb@r ed causn, to 131 33v33c33 befoxa the Courz.

Please afile aaid 'PETITIQM' before the Couxv» 33v1n3 the appropriate Jur13dietton ovmr 113 mama,- at tha Court’3 earlieat convenience. By copy 3£ thi$ latter, and the enclosed 'PETITIQN' I'm fcraaz§img the 3333 to Respondant, Hon. KRISWIN GUINEY: Judga, 179th 33313131 Daamzict Court, ., 1, ' .WQ 41 13333, 77002. 1333 1319 in Eiling 3313 wHefore the Couxt, at the Court'z eagliest ven13nc@, wculd 33 gr3311y appx3ciat3d,

'~.\» f¥; R@$pectfuLly subm§twnd, HECEEVED EN COURTOFCHFMINALAPPEALS MAR 16 2315

;‘€"' Caus@,mo. 731113~§7 'Pt¢ cba ND¢ M:_§

KEV!N TEBRELL_TATUM, §» rn The Texaa c¢urb €Agplicant) va. § O£ Crimlnal Appeals WILLIAM STEPHENS' 31£~ Gf TDCJ»ID, . (Raapondant)- § Travia Cpunty, Texaa

'PerzrxonEa-s nsauzs? ron ansoLuTxuN ns coarus ~Not A Fact Finding Gourt-. ~Appointment O£ Counaal-

TO THE HOHGRABLE JUDGES,UF SAID CQURT| P¢EABE TAKE onxcE, thus coMEs\Now, nsvrw wERaELL TATUM, Applicant, Pro Se, in the above styled and numbered cauae, files this.hia “Fetition For Reaolucion 02 €um;me“, in good ialth, and in the interest of justice. Petibioner asserts ove Pgocess-would be best aarvvd by this ¢ourb Granting the eame, an§ in support thataof, your Petitioner §§uld present unto %him Honozable Court the followings `0 - "' _ RY 03 A' _2 That your Pet.itioner advanced' a Post-Trial implication for Writ of Habea$ Corpda before thé Trial Courz, pursuant to cause Nw. lgdeGH~B, in the 179hh Judicial nisttict Couz£ of Harris County, meas, on. or about luna 12, 2012. The ?rial Cou%t *'D@signateé leaves To Be R@sclved* on said Writ Sept@whax 259 ZBIZ.

Youz Pebitianez advancéd an Af£idmviu, con$isting of a \'r@¢antabion’ from the $tah@'a gay witneee, CHARLEY IVCRY, §§Qng with slaims of Ime£fec§iva Assis£anca of Cbunéel. 8atd` claias should have been 'sup§lemantad‘ to Cause No. AQQLQQ§;§¢ but waxe unduly $@parahed by th& Court as two (2) distinct Cau&@ Numhaxé. Th§ Txial Courh}advanced Canma No. LQQQOQ§~§ to this Hon@rahla nonrt, but dz$ not advance P@uttioner's 'lsm;~§l§m§zzt~al paint_.:a‘¢ sty;l.m! ms sze§e No. _"_Q___g§_g_§;_§ to this chaxable Court. Eh$ Taxaa court of aximinal A;peala ruled on Cause Nn. 1932908*§, onAy, wtyln& by this Cmurt as Cauea N¢§ ?3¢221~9§, on March l$, 2014. Ther@after, yo$z' ?aticioner advanced a 'Fede:al Hah®am Ccrpus' to the United States Distr;ct Caurty Causa No, §:Ld~l?j , challengihg the Gon@titubionality 05 his Qon£inamant, on both cause mumbar@, i.a., Cau@e Nc._;§gggg§;§ and LQ§§QQ§;§. §§ Was th@n; §pen the Respondent'a rasponse, that yaur Patitioner was appri@ad, fcc the first time. Cause No. 1043008~3 was still pending, and was never reso&v@d by the Trial eaur%¢' The Respcndedt moved to ho§d Causa Nc. g»g§»g?§§ ié_ abeyance, pending the resolution of Cause No. lg§gOQB-.. On aeptembez 29, 2014, the Honorable FRANCES STACY¢_o£ the voided Bnanes mistrict Court, GRANTEB aba aame.

Th§r§after, your F§titiou§r §r§§§ 'a 'Lettar O£ Inquiry' to th§ T:i§l-Court, s§§king be d§§§kmin§ whether or not Cause N§. ;9§3998~§ wa§ §till pending. Th§ §ourt r§spondad ana §§§ri§§§'you§ P§§iti§n§r that sai§ Wri§: aaa §til; panding.

Th§r§§§§§r, your' P§§i§i§ner aé§a§c§d§ a !P§titi§n, F§: Wri§ 05 'H§nda§§§’ to this C§§r§. seeking §x. ca m§§}. the Trial Court to xae§lv§ hi§ cl§i§s advanca§ in Ca§§§ No. lg§ggg§;§. Said 'Man§§mu§', styl§é ina C§usé No, ” 7‘+ F, w§§ deni§d, without §x§l§§§§i §n, on §§e§§h§r l§,-EGI§. : Yo§;zr i~‘§§,itior§§r §§v§mc§<i a '2:§5 '€@§i§:ion E`Qr '§§~it’. of Mand§§.§§ §§f§r§ thi§ §§n§rahla C§ur§, §§ or about February 3, 2315, §§aking to ccm§§l r§§clat§on of his clai§s, §nd .§§sarbing §h§ act §ought §§ §§ imp l§m§nted la whoily ‘M£ni§§§xi§l'. and §§§n §itw §§§ §§§Hci§t of &ue dili§§§§§, your P§titi§n§r had §§ §th§r E§§e§y of La§ to compel r§§ul§ ti§n cf his clai§, p@nding §§on§~ §1§ Cc usa far two and oa§~h§&f, !2%) j'§ar§. S§ecifically. y§uv F§bition§z mow§S the §c§rt to hav§ §h§ Trial C§urt §§§r§a§ §R§"A§£iéavit' of the St§h§'§ K§y Wi§n§§§, CHARLEY ;VORY» §h§s§ ‘R§c§ntatiun' gives §rad§§c§ eha many 'C§ en§§ §i§n§§§§s’ §§rsi§u cf the eva nta, and vhc§e 're§amt§§ §§ sti. mony'-excuip§hce P@tition§r of the chasg§§ ofé§n§§. M§r§§v@r§ P§tition§r d§§ix§§ to have this Cou§t compel the T§ial §§u§§ to r§§olv§ Fetition§r'§~claim of In§£f§ctive As§i§tan§a §§ Coun§§l, wh§s§in Trial Ccun§al conceded §o on§ of §§ titi§§ §§ § point §§ §cror§. ~¥§ur P§titicn§r r§c§iv§d no §§§§§n§e from his '2§6 Mandamus'. H§w§v§r. Y§ur Petivion§r r§"§iv§d n card from this licenorable Coutb, devex-2 2/9/2€115, and postmarked 2/23/2015, apprising ?Qt£eioaera ~on this aay, she application ser 11.01 starr or mem CORFU$ has bean recw£ved aaa praaented to the Court;" Said writ was advanced to this Hdnbt§b&e Goutt, without any adequate '£'act. f'lnding' on the merits of P@titionar's claim and »vithoub your Petitionm: receiving .a copy at the Cou:t's order and Ruling go the Writ.

II¢ NQ_I § FACT FI!‘!Q§NQ 'CQURT That your Petitionar saaarté ha presented before the T:ial Court sworn to alluga§ians -c£ facta, material to the legality of hié confinement, and said claima wer@ 'never resolved by the Trial Court¢ This Henotahl@ Taxaa_€ourt ¢£ ¢ximi;al Appeals is not a 'Pact vinding Court', and puzsuant to eha dictates af Art. 11.07(¢). the Trial C@urt must max@ a determination on whether cr go:'chera exisp controverted, previ§usly unraaolved issues cf 'facts, material to the legality of Petitioner’s confinement. 'The Ttial Coutt ’d@signated issues to_ be r@$olved* \Sept@mb@r 25, 2012; Mo:aovex, subsequent vs the designation of iasues, your _Petitionec supplemented 'Newly Discove::ad Ev.i.dence' of a Key witness 'Recantation’, and the same was submitted in the farm of a 'Swoxn To n££idavit' from the Sdate*s kay Witnesa, CBARLEY IVORY, Aa of this date, there bag yet to he any resolution of IVCRY'e uastimony, exculpating Fmtition@r of the charged offenee. nor a§y detar$inntion of Counael‘w daf£cient performance and ineffectiv¢ assiatanm@.

Pursuant to 'tké `provisions of _Art. 11.G7 (d), the Trial Court ia the '§act finding Ceurt', and can hold Hearings, appoint d$;hoel, or undergo other prcc@eéings to massive Petitioner‘s claims and wage the requireé»'fact finding' an tha Marita me P@Ritiamer'$ claims; As cf thié.dat@, Harch 12a 2015, your Petiti¢#er has get se recaiva any responme §rom the Tri§l Court ':e§olving' Paticiener's claims{ and ass@rt the passage 02 the Writ, `a%yled` ns Cauaa No. 1§&1;$:§§, Qam advanced prémgtuxely, as nhl@ Conrt canho@ adequately resolve the merits of Patit§onar’s claims uitheu§ a 'fact finding’ reaolution from the Triul Cou:t. SP@ Art. 11.0? (6), G.G.P. III.

REQUEST EGR APPO!MTMENT CF COUNSEL That pursuant. to sz. 11.07(@), smp£a, am§ tha groviaicn$ of brt. 264§5, C¢C.P., tkis .Court can rappoint Counaal° for th@ reeolution- of his claims; §$v&nc@d in the wxit, Petiticnar aas@zta he presenta uontrevérted; previously unresolved facts, mataximl to tha lagaztvy sf his canfinmmenh, by advancing 33 ‘&E?idnvit' from eha Stav@'a H@y Witnesa, which clearly exculpatea Patitionar of the charge£ affanaa, rand is pivotal tc bia claim of net quilty.` In a&$itian, Trial Counsel, in addréusing one of Pet§t£oner's poim&a of erzar, ‘/ conaeded to 'deticiepc' performance* that Prejudiced Fetttioner's éth Ame:zdment Righi:s.` Consequently, Petit;'ioner , asaert§ Dua Procaaa and tha interest of justice would ba`heat; nmervad §dy this Cowrt Granting him 'Cadnsel' for the resolution of Hiw meritaxious claime. P@Rit$on§r contenda, in light mt bna nabacé of she €acba ®xeulpatiag Your 4P@tivicnmr of t&e chargmé offen$e, tHis ¢murv ahmuxd'mkaww a mering en the Her£ta, for tke\ §aix."v and just resaluti¢u of ?@titicner'e claimm. Pebiti&ner GQABGRGS baeausé this Conzt ia not a *fact inding' Caurt, and that kh@re still exist concrovarzaé, iii unreamlved allagatio§@ of §acbs, matsrial he the kegality of &iS confinam@nh, thah vega RQVQF raadlv@d, able Court should d@t€¥mi§@ %hé §a$$a§e of tva writ §§ [email protected],g, gtyle§ ag Cauee Na. Z§LZZL;QZQ was prematmraiy advanwad. ¥‘.,T.HERBF_ORE; !’REMI$I€$,- §§GZMEN"?S and AUTBQRITIES CCNSIDERED youx Petitimner pray§ and reayecvfully~ ur§& §Gr &his Honorabla Cenrt ts detérmin% the Writ, Tx. Ci. NQ. 1§420§§;§, Snd this Court Cauae NQ- Z§LZZL:QZ¢ Was advanced pramaturely, as the game §Qe& mht ve$szva @h@ mwx§&~zioua §Qints of errcra, material to tha legality §§ hi$ confin@megz, m§r a§§reaé the ‘n@wly discovarad evi&wnca' of the ;r@canbe@' tastimomy from the State‘s key witnese¢ axeulpating yeux P@tition@r~o£ the lcharged b£f@nsa. Patitionar prays this Court woul§ Grant him‘ leave to hava the ‘Ap cintmant of Cuunzal° an& hold a 'Haaring' ne the Nerits of yatitisner's claims.

Alh@tnahiv@ly¢ Your Petitiwner prays for whatever other, furmher' or éi££¢ranc re£iwf this C§urt daem is just. and fair.

Petitioner uaaétts -bh@ ‘Feééral C$uru is currently welding his Writ in ‘&bey&nc@*._mné cannot adequat@ly move forward with tha resczutian §£ the alaima ar§§sd heféim until this Court iseae forth ita de€i$ion, af;ar ake fact finding £rom `the Triu£ Ccurt. Petit§mnar coni&n$ éue §rocg$@ ana the interest of justice warrants resolution sf his claims. ft is so prayed for by Fahiti$awr.

Rwapwct§ully sn§mitt$é, §?I"T:‘VI.’»! ?;'VIEERELL T,%TUI€£ \ Fetit;gner pro Se . WHCJ;GLQCG?G&` *” ogrcinghon*va;u ~EQ»Bazr§§gton-R§. ,J Roe§§rq¢; Tx. 7758?

PUnsuAN'r 'ro ~'rz'rw 6, cnap'rea 132, v.'r.c.A., carsz PRAc'rIcE 'A'mn ammons come, mm 28 0.3.0. § 1746=-' z, sceva TBRHELL TATU, -Peei£io`ner, Pm se, being currently conf;nad in the Texaé nepartmeht of C:iminal Juabice _ - lnsticutional Divieion, at the Dacrington Unis, located here l£n Bcazoria County, T¢xaa, have read the foregoing 'PETITION '\F.GR' RESOLUTIQN OF .CLAIHS“, and presents lime above argument, seeking to have eha court con$idar the Ccnstinutimnal Merit of exculpatory pptnts at errors ~advancadz' asix,p!rs¢x',""_a`u¢§l`l hereby DEPGSE and DECLARE under the pain and panalties of Perjury the foxegoing'"?ET!TION” is trua and correct to cba base of Fat£tienar's Belief and Knowledga. lt ¢ , Exz:cuz'z~:r) os~z -rx~us ‘rms~ _/“Z_]L amc or )/VVOH“GR\ . , 2015-. ......

MMM

mva TF.-»lzzxam~.x‘. 'PAT¥:M»€ " PQ%[email protected] Se, TDGJ 31409?40 matringtoa Umih Rosharcn, Tx. 77583

I, KEVIN TERRELL TATUM, Petitioner, Pco Se, files this his "PETITIGN FOB RESOLUTIDN GF CLAIMS", in good faitha seeking to have the Court. consider tva ccmsti.tut.ional `Merit.a ct his claims advanc@a in his writ, along with his suquezt 'fdr Appointm@nt. of Counsé; and a {Heariug', hareby* CERTIFY a true and corce¢thegible copy cf the foregoing 'PETITIGN' was.sarved upon the below name§. and named parti.es, by placing -tha same in the United Shates Mail» in as wrapper, with postage affixed thereto, on this the Jéz&bxday of Z!!¢szA”` ,¢ 2035.

1. TEXAS COURT OF GRIMINAL APPEALS &ttn: Hmn. ABHL ACQSTA, Cl&r% F.Q. Box 12308, Qapitol Stabion Aua%in, Tx. 73?11 _ 2. HAHRIS COBMTY CCUHTH$U&E Hon. RRISTIN H. GQINEY¢ dodge 1291 anmklin Sb., 13%& ¥;., chston¢ Ta._77002 /

U,) 9 ,) KSVIN TER§ELL'TATHM_ ` ` ?ahitienaz¢ Prc.$e__ TDCJ #1409?40' Darringtcn`vni¢” Rosnaron¢ Tx. 77583