Charles, Amador Casas
Charles, Amador Casas
Charles, Amador Casas
Opinion
d£xm c£QAjMXkV^L A^lALj^ tyflliAS AM /^0^£HA£jL£5 AaM n. I,t£lAS, 789 \ I U? CoulIO 1uUIT
U£_A)XL. AcasnA,
A66£A\fAT£^ f£*uA(_ Af&Au IT ofaCKiJrJ. (Hk£&i£U 2R-tnj^x^T/?irx Pc!>u£r, jJu£C£l CouUTM ,TsL fCfje&SO-teiS'Ttr 3
x ujouiri IAl ut£u 6ftKr£JL>L -fbfUooe. A<£3SrPhUC£. TJL\ -tVta-S VfflU 2LM/b£T^)T LftflA(_ MATTEL ib7/U0L 7] A-^i ^ UCfd tff fw^ nJ-fi&Mmoti TO PfoWCL LAU CAS£L d4feS
£T(Cd
COURT OFCRIMINAL APPEALS MAR r8 2-, AUAlo& £M A6LLCS K'-'""' '~ Train-aD^UM^OtS ®lAeos?a,Cfgrk
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.