Royce William Tawater v. State
Royce William Tawater v. State
Royce William Tawater v. State
Opinion
QHEQ>~ zo:om E~o§ 355 01 QEZEEL >Em>§ am §X>m mFm OO…J\ w.©. wOX Swowu O>EHOF m,~]>~EOZv >ijzo HmX>w qmq: &\_ .~`No\_m OO> zo. om-\_ h-ooo~m-n_» ._.m<<m§ _»o<om <<____m=_ , _uU- ocoh- dm >_Qcm__m:.,m 20 mm nw§_o: :mm vmm: B_:Amdma. ,mm 2 55 Qm$ 26 mnnm__m£m 20 mm Um§o: .no_1 Q_moqm`h_o:m<< _`m<_m<< _3 o<< oosm_am_‘ma H_Bm_< _h__mq.
>cm_ >oom~m. G_m_% @._.I.OOCD._. O_H >U_um>rm O_lm_£A Ummw_m >C._.Dm< Z. m._.>._.m _._Zm ><m. ._.mX>DX>Z>. ._.X wmmo\_-m@m@ * Um_¢_<mDmU <_> _m._<_>:l *
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.