Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2015

in Re Joshua Tyrone Lane

in Re Joshua Tyrone Lane
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided May 19, 2015

in Re Joshua Tyrone Lane

Opinion

of

May . ^'7^SW

loJ^t/9 7/Jt>y£ //9^S£ J?S0,S^' | I/.

I

MoS. 3cSJ£> //if S&72JX.

Ke*/e*//%. 7r//f

C/V f/f£// of CoAA/^/S 2/>AAAJA/ dA AA/A /A/AjrAS AAA £olAS&: 2JAAX of /9t///j/j:AjrAs JL S/AA/mAAX <?A 7^ CASA* 4 A/3c<mJA7 -LL /f//>/*J SAoUJ A£ 3/A-/A&/ Ad>£/faSe K£/A/0/C //AS SAolJA AAJ J£aaoASA/#A£ &Af ///s Md/AdA AAS Jez^ A/?AJ 0A 3/MJ//A Ao Atf£ /fAA^A/*^ o'A A&£ f//AA ColsA / h £*JCAisjto~/ /?^A> //A/ex. / CfrA/A/cA/e aA S£A<//££ ~~^

// Jj/SJX dZ /9t7s>/ojtlXZZ^S

i crex./rr/J S

! ^ soxd r/Xyf/7 crtxy/rsj i

_J^ : /toJA' tS- /7S& CocsT a* */S*'J

A

A MM

0> S7/?XImX«sX 0A AAA tAfA /Me fcMXXo* Sz^X oX Xsfse^Xzj A A<?sX Xo^t/X&bj MoAoA xe?c.zs//yj xAxx AAx> Xcsxxaj Xe j0^£ xh>~ dfA /XoXfj JA C/)sc Ac^Xf^s sXX72-y, jyxxj-/ 'Wi/*"* aA 3"'*^*y/s< *>xs st* axa/xxa /I X/XAtA /At SMAC Set/eon XASX Ate m«Ka Mou* X£ Sas/m se*. AXAX^X yf" s/tus/ MS XAC/ /fXtssX XA<?X XXX£ A^oy-AXAA 3<.**<~ 3XXAX AA <UXf* Xb AaxA S4/jr AAA skoAApS <?A 3*A<*y;s. Joss. As oX AA/s AfXA A> <?0 ^y IxAvz Ao A/X£ A ^AX *A X^^A^Z Axf J<-*j£ AAJ AoX MAJe A AtXeXAj *A SAA* AoXXb ja j a»j*A*A AcXAAtA, Ao X^e ^ Sax aioX/oA.

y> Jsste.. PAAS£A/£/? AAA AAJ^I^X \ As AX /?AA6t.ses oX S/scsxXXdA a>A XXe. yAAX.

3c*JS AoX A XcX£ oA y? XXa*£XX AiaX/aA XAAX A/?s XeeA XsXse^Xf* Xo XA£ XA^X £o^A s?^ 1 TAjyX/AX AtXX AXX. \

S7XXd/?/J <?X X£y/£tJ I — j An/fAdXs-tJ As XA dxysAot-AAs/X 7£ytof<XX, j XyX//XXy£ oXyX/A X/m/X^J £U£c~, jyj^y&rj . I CxxAdyXA AeAcaxycss /yj, ty. A/yvXSj xxy sjJ. I ZJ. 2o </, 3o s 6AyXXXXAJ. AX A XA£ AisdeS aX j 77/£ /XXXXo^ Xo jy/ou £^X/A/£^tf^X Xo XA£ s?ys£*: be/Xj 7£?tysXed. S££. JesarAXZ/ 3oA^sa^ ts. \ fa/XA day.A i,X A/ASXXJ. A*0 S.Q.2J. XXX, XXX j CJ£IAZ£SJ Cas-Ai. Sytca-jysj} ja W^^o \ ^f?f'?as/ * /e4/'^> ^ fa/'SJAj : tOXXJSX /O AesA,*, J £ZXA d£M^A Ae* xyjA \i SeyA,s~AAc£ j ^d £Jy y? s^Xts^ Ac *&. \

U r/, I, A <*"»**-' sAot./^ ^ d£A,£d XAXX )AAJ AAXA aA J/fS/y*~y'ys z0yS '*%%£'. " **** ""* /a^ I 2//S \X£// SfSXy^d XA/fA A AA/td. docsX As ~fitrA I £e?A/vdSo £eJs/d£s£-A MoXXoX AAtzV XX y/s?S AaA \ l?ecA AsfscAAeJ A/A SX/d MoAAaS. <?'C*~/Ser4: c \ AAA docs-A <?A AAAXXXS, A37 JOZd AA"SA | £AAxSizz) Cm/umA^J syyy 77JZ2. Mrs jffl&C AA AXJXA AcAX Xo SexAe>/>~* AA*^~ focAAAoSpyyAXAyAJesu^S Ahr /lesA*^****-.

C^XdX^AS foXT-XAoAf AfAAAAoS SAa^y^ j£ jyAXAcfyp AC AAs deMoSj/AMrs AxAA AAA JaaJs ZV^Z AXJ AAAxA Ao AAA. CMr //A/AA Xa/AAox AxXAj Avx Xcfx/xA *&r~ 3lsS CexAAA/'cxAA- aA a-*/xAr,* OS~AB 7^AA/tA ma/ AbAS A£ s^x AXXr A*A. Oatf osxAocsXcA AAA ArAiya Ao SXXe AMy/A of'• y^ASAA^cs AX Ay?/A A/Vs- A&- CoASAAAYAs/A f/7 /£. ^ ytfS£*A AS. SASA? // IMAV A

1 Zaaa/aa W *A 3x1a-Assess NOS. 54972-1 54973-1

EX PARTE § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF § § 300™ JUDICIAL DISTRICT § JOSHUA TYRONE LANE § BRAZORIA COUNTY, TEXAS

ORDER On this day came to be heard the Defendant's Motion for Post-Conviction DNA Testing. The Court takes judicial notice of the Reporter's Record, the Clerk's Record, and the Court's File. Having reviewed these documents and the affidavits and documents submitted, the Court Finds that the Appellant has failed to show by a preponderance of the evidence, that he would not have been convicted if exculpatory DNA results are obtained as to the matters he requested be tested. The Applicant, therefore, is not entitled to obtain additional DNA testing under Art. 64.03 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

The Court further Orders the Alvin Police Department to retain possession of its evidence until disposition of this claim is final to ensure the preservation and chain of custody of the evidence.

The Court also Finds the Defendant has failed to show reasonable grounds for the appointment of counsel as required under Article 64.01(c) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Court DENIES the Defendant's Motion for DNA Testing and Request for Appointment of Counsel.

Signed this the . day of , 2015.

Judge Presiding RECEIVED JAN 15 2015 Rhonda Barchak Brazoria County District Clerk CocxA oX AAAAAAr /A. AAsAAcA w yyjySS SA/Xf/ /kuSyTS, 7AXAS 7P**z -**S*

W- JoS*** yxAZAASAaXAo OoXXX/TA JAo* fp/A'- 7>S- AAxe^A AX./AA/A AAA* CA-yyA; //as* &e ^/^f/% M^r*%Z X/y/f 0AX ^ j:s 7" ICSS Co/re*.

f- 7^0/j* 8H HOUSTON, TEXAS m 19 * FR A. PR|NE CHR»STOPH£H j» wmju1

j CXse. Ae. 'SoSAcy use ^ljr „, _ AC/At^-** A S-J "** A"S7 £<?<.*A aA y, /}//ArAAr / AocsAoS AX~XX>s Ao7A*<S 7d f/AA less Co/fcs

Hod. IlsAcAs £o~£s S*d>y ss?oc.<nsA AAA CocsS Xo W** 3osjc,A< Ay^t>J ' ,c& y,, j<?AAy> decoys ^ - RsBRb* »stopher A. PR,NEj

t^si^iyz ,yy&2fA: ar" r

to I <s

\

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.