Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2015

Eugene Anthony Lynch v. State

Eugene Anthony Lynch v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided September 25, 2015

Eugene Anthony Lynch v. State

Opinion

C<durv fi-P fiPPtftu fo$ rw^ fi rrH District o-Ct.l***=> „ RECEIVED IN COURT OF APPEALS, 5th DIST.

SEP 2 4 2015 hPPhLL-Ar*T % Ct\u*>£. rf&.'s LISA MATZ CLERK, 5th DISTRICT %

f\fP£u_££ .

i\xcn~t6Ki To Pfc^c_ee_fc> Iaj p£^> b<i AjHicw APP£L/L/i»uT / <a f^t" A/i ^

AfPtLcA^T, Ext£.cr*€. AajTH^niV L^Mttl ; ri £.&£&¥ fti/f^ 7~WiS, teu(?T

77/^ b7*Te To (SSu£ fl <r tfpf «*r DcCu/»\.t.w(^ */v>a T£jflL. Coutif $£.CaeJ)*>j -SV dBTanO nv>£S T&£ f*u-L flivifl CamP-i£>-£ FiL<£. /Rttcaab i"W>£s«i.cLa 6V ri4~d:m_ PaeSuM/ur T£ MicHA-El -MaiCtetf ficT-Sb No.

f^TH THE f^U_^^»M^7 4/1 tr^ Aa;a CiUCLimS^^t^ '.

JUPftMdNt I *s J^/D -A.\J£) TA£ Ctfu^c Mu*>T &£ £.£ /h f\AJ/? £ £> fc?£.

8o(| Crex. eni»t\. ^ /v. )^*i I) 6CS uPft/h&ASr &{ PR.cBa nosJ fc» & APP>£»UrtTveo .fl!> s^uct u> itH ft frt^o' K>£rtfo/0 ujws &ajAutH^ tf£i"*-C-D BY lv\u^ AW£ KMS 1-eiO iS Car-6<£ A-L/vj^AJ^dO f^>^L /VviA.6T ria^T ArrdMpT T<o SP.^/r/f/4LLV Atir^)n ^ru/'r Pie a- .

K/1 lY 3i, TMis rv/»rii)/vj rs Pfcds^A/^o In 6^^c5,d f #9 irn *>& that

,x ArP.£UAA>T i€» e.Mi\T-Ldo T-a ^Ojiesf, 6^ H^5eA *b to&pu** Ae- L-jdF / /W/3 IT 1^ e>6<b.€.N»T;ML F#/£ W/m 7~0 Sitt^tLA&cH TH£^ fj^eu/vte/^r^ fc/^£> AaBim Coa*T £ec^p>-^ To TokmulaT^ a/w?

3« APP-t LL»<\fvT ASK 77f/5> COuaT T& £>£*aj7 tf/s P£6)U±<T F^/? TH<£

i.^ftBtt p»au^c: Hfpipai/u /*£ AWte^r hJAnin\^y ,

*). CvUA&£^> d-Y TM^ C^ixfiT C^U iLP ///VA3 OLd/OW } ^ £. Coue.Vs DackeV S^t'T^ >

<?. i^re-^ >a>ti£<^ J^*s tw£ t<»u/ix /r*)0&£ T*> T*/e Ju&v / /I. td.ytfY n t\?P.£AL- WA^VfihS j a, D.eSift/o/iriD/O of kecofu^ owj APPEAL, • -7 13, Court ££iwrev^ T£**a&c/u&<^ tJ4T£s>sto£~r(liil(- /teniu^ >T£iA<~> H. co(v\PLt;>e QtPoRr.tiL'5 fieccD^^>, 1(* , t).eF^.^0ANT"S M?TiCt c^P (\PP.&A<- y IT, CAPift'b /

^. APPeU-c^'s AP^Ac BR-ieF > 9ki , COuAT ^ APPEAL- opwtttOj KX, APPELLANT'S hUtCi^ / D3, ftMP> A^J1/ "i ALL <S>+j.t>£_ Dtfturvu^T/ ^XrHB tY^ , KJ*/&^> jJ£W- K)UATYllt ^TAfc£'s R^xi^^^^r^ u»(Vf<l«0 TT/fc/A- j^sScfSS/(i;/>J

,?^T^ D.llA^ Cu/uW OiM^tr^TD^^Y^l^^^ Tile fiLc^>

/rn^ Re<Puci^>7~

T-tfftT~ TH<^ TcPa/ir Qpa^T His pL&titF SeaffH-r //e/te /aJ „

£(;£;Zni£ Awp^aj"/ LWcU

uioft.e*-Tte P^tOM-Tt' c^P^iu^r^T T~*ie F^ficA/ft d&*«^ ^TArenu^jT s» &fo/) Fflt]^ Afl-£ ]>n£ j codiLecT T& MY Ktw^L^nt^ aat*:' %^\ •v01 =s /< .rl^^u^^A/TrflUMJ

T«e Pie>7RiC7 OL<^ CocuuTV ,V<£** <=>•** ^u^ £^p/ p^Tfiicr hTTfit+tfX'*> office j /33 *J. fU»tSJFto>*ST BLt/b*s n A3 «1 vA (0 nS~ ;r i **C~' -J 5 ji 3 -—

i'0

^ 0 j^ ~\ 3^ v/> ~™

k ^ ^-* *N iE~

Si <u 1 3 tt -—

fO <3" \> .i-i si r*> •* ^c o o iii z r-

VP X Ji)

'+J > vP ^ \P J ^ 2.o~<

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.