Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2015

Jeffrey Steven Marx v. State

Jeffrey Steven Marx v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided October 27, 2015

Jeffrey Steven Marx v. State

Opinion

The, SWHt oflefos § SN TtiF F^STCoukj-0£Appals Jeffrey S+efe*/ m/lX § t-ause #*; oJ-W-ao)oq-W TRm) Cou#± Cause m>< yyqj tKOhou- t> AB/frF The. Appeal QMj „tie*

HdOo toMes/ 3ef£Aey SjeVe*/ MM Tb&S-TD no,*?)U13, as MvzMt wd Would Piequcs-h flB&teMeflH- aM he/fa*ki Back -ho

PRoccdufa ffl<h3d.ZlL$3(*)0~*)* **d mom 5/iM+he

Pef/V/V/ve^ hos sf&teA //i/ hi£ Appeal hheAe uoas A/a Jft£)<g0Aj; eWo hearty held oH his Sj-Q+emet)^ )N CQUSe Not *7fy3 a/i/J he S7/)T£ OF Tetos has A/of ShouoN atiy AlpURevf- Q/od -c&tfJ/Vfc -h SocHsoa/ V. DeNNQ atoA fl(H- 38-22 Pe+*V/oA/e/l /s 'ti-Mcd-te SUth c\. hea/Vty *ri to 5Wh he<rfty has b&/i/ wduc+eJj //i/ abuse No; 11Z3 ^ P&ti/MfcA is e/fefej }€> %UCh A heakitoq beMc his siptiemenif tw be us^ \§4in£+hi/fi }H 0. cotiRj- 6% Law t*C<P°®f\f. 12>2X§L* ~h n

SMtA'. «Z+ »ms cmluJet Hm- we 5h>a0 lately ahai* iu* ftppul ad OH* ^ \uA^ *Z^T^J/ OeNNO he*A**3 «a/<J $U))M,f his -P//id>>9s o-P £acf />/iri CONc\\tSb/t$ o$ kt>L\A +0 +h# Com?* A/ouj ~hh,S f/baHM*rth <*n& eMefi i* Conduct- Such <\ heaR?^ t^C* p&hMoriejl by $>V}ty h?n his ^onSH/M^o^) QNd Si/94Uf-oAy R'shh -k> $i40h ct heating 2<) Wfitild give the FitfrCjMM- e£ fypeq)$ /?// pht fttete W wo«/d S<AVe #>^ -/-//»?e £/\d P>eSouQ.£eS cxvd twlfjd <XNSk>e/L -hh<L<jUeSh'3A/ o$ VduhfrWNeSS of ^ SifijeM^* Thus tfvfy nx UhiM M ££M to IBM QmkL

0% 4hc +Atal CouR+ oMte «W Qoil all if $fatihe\ Wot /-P Sti^emrit w&S VoluNj-alty oooujd e/vj( -hh(L &/>}**! 8di~ if- /V- \#b& p>coqf tfiiVoluNtflAy Mould -&us Be, fieMa^ed &>R AW Pfticil Ooifhou-f- +he S+fHweiHr* ~Thus /ecu/Sty Q/i Co/yshiu-hi^l awd S+ft+lftoRy Qjtffe )NHW. ~Thi£ hsMRable Coc\tih booulk txW$ti- ^m SUCh ^ he*tiu$ Loh>dh 5Mel We bee/V he/A iN ±he~ he.^wty o-P Phis CQ££ buf- loUS friof */»c) p&h4ie>A/eA 00a£> j/fy/lied +o %&i\d\ a hzaRitiq k^e^ -2- MliKNe/'s d-d hie. &£ Such Cl W/#5 but; // ^<xS VeyeJt do/Ve; So pet-l+hticR, should a/0ou he em-iHeA -h SUch IX he^'% A>ow i-o heMMrie j'f SM+e/He/fj- was Vdu/v+cfy/ ^J ^veM H!<ih+ ic •jAcJ&w/fimio hUhfi5i -hhus if suck £//9*>Ate4/fi he Jeered iNYtlkfftmy A/eu) i-A'Al defied M-f-hotih the. S^MeHnWh

LOhe/te-bA-., bkk PftoM',£es CovstieR^, P&m.'mcA PAays -thaJ- .vcompUMce- ui-fh the, Co%^ oP M/yiMtrlPPoc&luRe AjyL&az 5J* wA oikteK T<*h& ik> Md a h&yz,^ cu/d Matt f/^s of

Relief hetf in pftzyej #>* »V iht &RM op AEfH&afr

$Weekly SVbmd BShlle Uto)+ AM? Yil)ey f€M T7330 -3- ibt The FimcodXt- oQA/peate FMMa/ stAe-eh

%£! Cause M ohH-#>w-®l- °CT %*m nn CHR,STOPf^P^

Ml W'foe X ux>m<k Aeyuefr M*+ you BK#$ +his fo*K6N -fo m'Aeb&ux Huddle &R heU CeA/sMefah'oA/ foA }£ She Ri\k$ on />, 1-hMocy chwqe, hhe. ck&H o£ hhe DocHe-h Sheeh <W We P Bac-X aM Save +he CoaRJ- hiMt W PesoaK&zs /£' She 9o Chooses he $R<vm- s/Ad\ f] fvio+lofi) hd^MdSp So pjeaft Bfa3 hh'5 io heU ftfteMif) &S Soon as R<x$sMe,« "X 4mtik pay, iaJc^Vmic^ Po£ poliR OSSspR-AlCe*

ftyelle. UN/+- NORTH HOUSTON TX 7 NAME. RECEIVED TDC# i~\\[f)\ji'Xb FIRST COURT OF APPEALS I HOUSTON, TEXAS 22 OCT 20-15 PM 3 L ESTELLE USSSIT FM 3478 OCT 2 7 2015 JHJUWTSVILLE, TX 7732© CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE CLERK 'Th£ C0U& ePffl&lfcFMfr frm°"> Texas _''Jj£j£Uesfc"3"3 vViriiIMbMMM*4^i^^mt^P*i^ff^W?pMi*i

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.