PD -011&~ 15

LYDE1L ANTON J0NE5 VS. STATC OF TEXA»»*0s^ C/6i '/* PETlTTnMF.Pi^MnTTQM FORMrtEAAlMA PETITIONER LYftELL ANTON TONER, GnftMTT THIS MOTION FOR R&IEARTN& IN RESPONSE TO THE RE FUSAL ISSUED BYTf^CRTMINAL COURT OF APP EALS QNMQVa\ABf:R^anmAMD requests the COURT TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING XSSI! ES J -r*,ler A n, ISSUES PRCfiEM-TED FOft ftftlffiFU/ StI^;?1^* CfiWtf^AlMtSTHAT. HIS FbaftTH AMENDMENT PROPLfrTV T/OTEAeST AJfif??W^:9ntAKr '^A$ VIOLATED, DUETO THE OPENING OF PETITIONER'S TOtST- £<-MS MAIL R/rrHOUT t-LCS CONSENT' AlSto PETTTIOMPR (Y)MO/TtS -tha* Vui

T^M^^^!^^riKrtZ uACANiN£ ALERTING 7D APACKAGE PfiKftAfti WDBAbLL f CAUSE r^r TO™?,|y*KSi5TAT1Sfl P03TAL SBKVT.CE IS ONLY SEEK AZEAPCU WARRANT* mSSUEl ft : PETITXONCR CQMPlAXNES HE. WAS £a£>ttCT£.D TO XVEffECTXVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL, DUE TO TRIAL ATTOAflEV FAZLXNI& TO FIL£ .A" ENTMfiUEUT MOTION IW ATrMELY MANNER SER)A£ THE TRIAL DA7E. SEFEA TO COa«T R&MTSfiS ftecDao cvoi,3,pa9<L € Uig ao-as); Also petitions ft compiaznzs he was subjected to rMEFFSLTXVE A££X£tAU£E Of COUNSELj DUE TD TAXAL CQUNSBlDft FAZLTM& TO i??^1^SH^,J°.^L^£SS«TM£ EVXDSMCE WITHrKl A CONCEALED AAA£L#tCkA££.

AlLPEftTO COUAT «EPOtfTEfiS fl£CO&> <VbL3.pfi0c. 3 L.M£. 1- ID. 5TftTfKLAK]p> V, WASMlAl&TOM^kk U,£, kkft (iqg4) THE SIXTH yWlEA/OA/lEW T guarantees the rh&ht td elective assistaxice coursel.

PACl 1 ARAUKAFMT X, AirrHnfttTTF.fi XSSIip A Kofev.UtoH^Sfafe^.aM ha *<in «a z.n *m \cm.tja *a xib.tnLn) flEJeCT£D Trie PROPERTY TMTPRPffTfTM FAVOft 0 P APftn/ACV XNTEftEST XfvJ TAKING*THIS APP«DACH,TH& FOdflTU AMENDMENT PAOTgCT PStoijE NOT PLACES, WlJAT A PEASDM KNOWING Ly-EJfAOSE TO THE PUBlXC. EV£W 5£!J?£.9,£W HoM£ oft OFrace*iSMorA subject o ftwe FDuffrw AMENDMENT RROTECTXOM. SLIT WtfAT He SEEKS TO ARESEWf AS WttlMTE, EVEN TW AW AP£A ACCESSI£LE To THE PUBLIC,MAV flcllOtfSTITllTIDWMY PROTECTED. THE MAJORITY QPTNIDN IN Tfte kak CASE DOES A/DT SLAB- OftArE. UPGfSJ THE PRIVACY APPROACH EXCEPT TOATHE HELPFUL oBfiE* - vJQSTZfliBLV RELIED? a^Txd^KWfJ '5 OFT- &OT£DCO«SSw£^ ^CnSn Tf?AT th^W^SSj1?^ K^pTATlOW OF PAIMCV; %82£ K^h^^Htlli p€Tm:ONEft CDMWAlNES HIS FOURTHAMEJWMEhlT Smttf* ^#51 SFS?Se,?rA^^W5TITUTI0A/AL SBA^AMO n^^^ffl&^^H HP 4>Nfi ^^ HELD THAT

^LOCKED CBUTwfi^DVC^T^£^A^IPr^lMAV^^^^ OBJECT THE POLICE 5TXTPn^^,^¥,LA^i^?U^ ^ CDimiN THB LESS R^TSSSCH- At LS^ S7uror ^I¥ SA,ME PiAt3B^FTC« AFfiUrT MXUANDDEHM^ DEFENDANT'S (^^^TeMS4$7if^P °N ^ ASSOMPTTON THAT

PA0a£ 9l AflGdJMEATT £ AlITHOKLTBES COMTTNliXNlfl ISSUE A^i^ SEAftg.tt nr^Aii .PArt^AftRfi .a^e protected '8 Y THE FOURTH AMENDMENT, FDUftTH AMENDMENT STATES THAT PWPIJE TN THE UNITED STATES Rl&UTS AftE PROTECTED XN THEIR PE^SDMS.rtOtises.PAPCftS, AMD EFFECTS. XNCLUDIM& PACK* AG£S TMAT HAVE BEEN hAMLED TAJ THE UHITED 5TATE5 US ~ ING THE UNITEDSTATES POSTAL SEtWICE >AMDTHATTtf£ f&CKA&E 15 STXLL PROTECTED (EfiPSCXALLy WHEN STILL ^ALJED) UWD£a THIS AMWDMEKh; SecAi.S.C.A 12i ITQ3motbh)

n$S2£Sy?2LA Jffr^S6s|Llifi&AGE.Oft PACKAGE IS AfOdEAftCH fiEOWte ^^^n^^r^TPJP^-^E WOULD tfEMAlfc) HIDDEN FRAMW

£££*&SUMMONH) POUZE HAD OWNED THE PACKA«£ to TH6 SAME EVTCAJT S/T 7flO/

Mte A%Sw?A^jStj^^^o^^ S^^ TO ™e OBJECT" TTB&F AMWMFUT & AHTHnp,-riTH XSS6IE 6 LQiMJcr 50MfcTT^LLE^IlTOBJ7M^r«JT Mftrfr

RftSE'3 AftfillMPMT & AlfrtfflftTTTES

THE SUPREME CDUOT MAS HELD TttAT TECHNIQUES 0F EN- COUttA&EAAENT NAM MOT REACH THE POINT WHERE THEV CftN 5 - TTTUTE«BJTftAPMlNT^: IFTHEY DaTHE PRESENCE QTEJir iBBHiaiT (MsiinnES A DOTNSE TD THE DEF^DfiNrS OTHERWISE CRIMINAL ACT, PETITIONER WAS CALLED &Y A UNITED STATE POSTAL XN SPECTOft TD COME flE - CIEVETHE AAlMPiW OHCB DELIVERED PACKAGE. THE EX ACT DEFINITION Qf ENTftAPMgMT IS A MAlTEP, AFQrS- PUTEjBirTlT CLEANLY INCLUDES THE SITUATION IW WHICH cc THE CRIMINAL DESITnK) Dm&mhTES WITH THE [POLICE A^fi) And rtey implant in the mind dfam inno&mt P&Sdh we DISPOSITION TD COMMIT7H£ 0ff8jSE AND TtitiaCE ITS • CD/MISSION IN ORDEft THAT THE/MAY PMSWlTE? fault.

.PRAYER PORTHE RE/feoKiS STATED IN THIS MOTION, PETTTIDNEfv ASKS THE COtfTTO (mm THIS MOTIdW fltf\ REHEAKCN&. SET THE CASE FOfi 0*Ai ARfiUMEWT, AMDAFlEAARGdlMaJTSuSTAlM PETTHbhERS ISSUES PflES£AJTEC> f*?ft fiEl/aBW, REVERE THeaiiDGEMOslTOFTHE'ffilALCDUftT, AHb ORDER A NEW TtflAU J P^fULLY ^SUBMITTED 5/DELL AlS)TqjjSrnDM£5 PETITIONEH PflO-SE TDCT:H:I4D£33S M.H.dlDFFIELb UNIT T£mES<aZ&CDlDtiY,TEYA$ 15821-

PAfiK 4 Ph -rma.-i5- rAAMrt.nhi.vwiqap-rA.

Tr.nr.k\n.M-msma-r(\

FKTTnfMnF5FRVTf.F X HtAEBY OEfiTIP/ THAT ATRUE MO COM&Z COPY OP TUG FbfiE- Gaaifc MDTXDN FDfi REHEftKENG HAS BEEN PftoPEKLY DELiV££ED 72?

THE CLERK tfEflfcSEltfnNG THE CLXJl^T DTCRZMXNAL APPEALS SVMAlLr XNGXTTO Ra&D^/a^ECAPnDLSTATKOAJ^AUSTlAJ^TEX^S 0X7/1 SV limited States postal seance dk> this j ^ DAy op dexm&zrsob.

Re^^TPULLV SO&Mina) LVCELLANTBS4TOMES TbCftfc l^DQ538 PETTTmNER Pfl06£ H.H.CDFFIELn UNIT 7BMESSEE CDUM}tTW& 15U4 pd - ona.- 15 ftMMii.fll-ia-flP<lM>fft

LVPfcU. ANTPN flPHEft

. State ot texas

CERTTfTCATE nr fiflnn TATTU xlvdell Anton mf^ , pErraaNEft in the above- styled cause num6H\5,Certifies that the fOREGraflfi motion rw KEl-iEAKD\16 IS DONE XN 6O0D FAITV\ And M&i-ftirdeJay, PETIT IONER IS iNCAfiCEftATEA IN THE 7EKA5 DE^KTA/IENT DP C8IM- BJALXaSTlCE -CID At H.H.COFFIELD LIMIT IN ANDER30X) LDUNTY, DECLARES THAT THE EflflEGOINEr IS 7RUE MD CDflRECT UNDER PEkIALtV OF PEtfJURV.EVECUieD THIS123^ DAV OF DUM BER obS5«

M)£LL ANTOfj>CIDhlES M.M.CDTFTELD UNIT TD£T# I40,353X f^TTTiDNEft ^°^ <36L>t R4JA54