ACCEPTED 14-12-01026-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/8/2015 10:29:05 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE CLERK No. 14-12-01026-CV ______________________________________________________________________________ FILED IN IN THE 14th COURT OF APPEALS COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS FOR THE 4/8/2015 10:29:05 PM FOURTEENTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE OF Clerk TEXAS AT HOUSTON, TEXAS ______________________________________________________________________________ GWEN STRIBLING HENDERSON, ET AL., Appellants, vs. JOHN RICHARD SHANKS, ET AL., Appellees. ______________________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Probate Court No. 1 of Harris County, Texas ______________________________________________________________________________ MOTION TO STAY EXECUTION OF MANDATE TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS: COMES NOW GWEN STRIBLING HENDERSON, RAVEN A. PITRE and CHRISTINE S. WILLIE, Appellants in the above-entitled and numbered cause, and move the Court to stay the issuance of its mandate of affirmance in part and reversal and remand in part in this cause, and in support of said motion would respectfully show the Court the following:

I.

On April 19, 2012, the trial court signed an order striking Appellants’ Original Petition with prejudice. On that same day, the trial court also signed an order granting Appellee John Richard Shanks’ Motion for Summary Judgment. This Court affirmed in part and reversed in part and remanded the trial court’s judgment on October 30, 2014. Subsequently, the Appellants filed a Petition for Review which was denied by the Supreme Court of Texas on February 27, 2015.

II.

The Appellants’ brief presented a substantial federal question to this Court for consideration; that being whether the order striking Appellants’ Original Petition deprived the trial court of the requisite subject-matter jurisdiction to grant the motion for summary judgment, in violation of the Equal Protection and Due Process Rights of the Appellants guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. This question was decided adversely to the Appellants in this Court’s opinion.

III.

The Appellants intend to diligently and timely petition the Supreme Court of the United States to review this substantial federal question.

IV.

If the Court does not issue an order staying the mandate in the cause, serious hardship would result to the Appellants in the event the case is reversed by the Supreme Court of the United States in that a new trial will have to be undertaken without one of the principle parties to this litigation. Thus, the issuance of the mandate in this cause may result in piecemeal litigation if the cause is reversed by the Supreme Court of the United States.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellants pray the Court stay issuance of the mandate in this cause until the Appellants have had an opportunity to timely file and receive a ruling on the Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States.

Respectfully submitted, WILLIE & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

By:/s/ Joseph R. Willie, II, D.D.S., J.D.

Joseph R. Willie, II, D.D.S., J.D.

4151 Southwest Freeway, Suite 490 Houston, Texas 77027 (713) 659-7330 (713) 599-1659 (FAX) SBOT# 21633500 ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANTS GWEN STRIBLING HENDERSON, RAVEN A. PITRE AND CHRISTINE S.

WILLIE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was served via e- service to Brett T. Berly and Ryan O. Cantrell, 1200 Smith Street, Suite 1400, Houston, Texas 77002 and Thomas A. Willbern, III, 1018 Preston Street, Suite 500, Houston, Texas 77002, on the 8th day of April, 2015.

/s/ Joseph R. Willie, II, D.D.S., J.D.

Joseph R. Willie, II, D.D.S., J.D.